It was the wrong thread

[Atticus Grinch]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
This Opinion does not really seem relevant to anything on this board, so I am guessing that this must be an act of gloating and that Atticus is the Plaintiff. Interesting way to out oneself, dude.

No kidding. How often does one get some easement by necessity goodness? Esp in California, where everything but Hearst Castle was built pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act? Damn right I'm proud.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
No kidding. How often does one get some easement by necessity goodness? Esp in California, where everything but Hearst Castle was built pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act? Damn right I'm proud.

Right on! Now you're helping.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Damn right I'm proud.

Proud of showing up without certified title?

[Shape Shifter]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051006/...logger_lawsuit

Court Rules in Favor of Anonymous Blogger By RANDALL CHASE, Associated Press Writer

DOVER, Del. - In a decision hailed by free-speech advocates, the Delaware Supreme Court on Wednesday reversed a lower court decision requiring an Internet service provider to disclose the identity of an anonymous blogger who targeted a local elected official.

In a 34-page opinion, the justices said a Superior Court judge should have required Smyrna town councilman Patrick Cahill to make a stronger case that he and his wife, Julia, had been defamed before ordering Comcast Cable Communications to disclose the identities of four anonymous posters to a blog site operated by Independent Newspapers Inc., publisher of the Delaware State News.

In a series of obscenity-laced tirades, the bloggers, among other things, pointed to Cahill's "obvious mental deterioration," and made several sexual references about him and his wife, including using the name "Gahill" to suggest that Cahill, who has publicly feuded with Smyrna Mayor Mark Schaeffer, is homosexual.

In June, the lower court judge ruled that the Cahills had established a "good faith basis" for contending that they were victims of defamation and affirmed a previous order for Comcast to disclose the bloggers' identities.

One of the bloggers, referred to in court papers only as John Doe No. 1 and his blog name, "Proud Citizen," challenged the ruling, arguing that the Cahills should have been required to establish a prima facie case of defamation before seeking disclosure of the defendants' identities.

The Supreme Court agreed, reversing and remanding the case to Superior Court with an order to dismiss the Cahills' claims.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051006/...logger_lawsuit

Court Rules in Favor of Anonymous Blogger By RANDALL CHASE, Associated Press Writer

DOVER, Del. - In a decision hailed by free-speech advocates, the Delaware Supreme Court on Wednesday reversed a lower court decision requiring an Internet service provider to disclose the identity of an anonymous blogger who targeted a local elected official.

In a 34-page opinion, the justices said a Superior Court judge should have required Smyrna town councilman Patrick Cahill to make a stronger case that he and his wife, Julia, had been defamed before ordering Comcast Cable Communications to disclose the identities of four anonymous posters to a blog site operated by Independent Newspapers Inc., publisher of the Delaware State News.

In a series of obscenity-laced tirades, the bloggers, among other things, pointed to Cahill's "obvious mental deterioration," and made several sexual references about him and his wife, including using the name "Gahill" to suggest that Cahill, who has publicly feuded with Smyrna Mayor Mark Schaeffer, is homosexual.

In June, the lower court judge ruled that the Cahills had established a "good faith basis" for contending that they were victims of defamation and affirmed a previous order for Comcast to disclose the bloggers' identities.

One of the bloggers, referred to in court papers only as John Doe No. 1 and his blog name, "Proud Citizen," challenged the ruling, arguing that the Cahills should have been required to establish a prima facie case of defamation before seeking disclosure of the defendants' identities.

The Supreme Court agreed, reversing and remanding the case to Superior Court with an order to dismiss the Cahills' claims.

Are you intimating that Byrd was not in the Klan or that Clinton didn't rape Juanita?

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Are you intimating that Byrd was not in the Klan or that Clinton didn't rape Juanita?

Which Clinton? Be more specific.

[Hank Chinaski]

why is Spanky's PM box full and I hardly get any PMs? I am much more social than Spanky. Do I need a sock change?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Which Clinton? Be more specific.

I'm sure if Juanita was your mom or sister or daughter you would not find this so funny. The worst thing is if Clinton ever inflicted himself on one of your women, I'm sure you would raise holyhell regarding why he wasn't locked up and salt petred, with his history of sexual predatoration.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
why is Spanky's PM box full and I hardly get any PMs? I am much more social than Spanky. Do I need a sock change?

Mine is full too, but I correspond with a lot of long-time lurkers no time posters, so it may be a different equation than spanky.

[Atticus Grinch]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Proud of showing up without certified title?

Two words: Scoreboard!

[Spanky]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
why is Spanky's PM box full and I hardly get any PMs? I am much more social than Spanky. Do I need a sock change?

I am just too lazy to delete them. They build up like lint in the dryer.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Spanky
I am just too lazy to delete them. They build up like lint in the dryer.

That's no way to cement friendships. Are they all from PAigow?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
That's no way to cement friendships. Are they all from PAigow?

FWIW, I only correspond with The Paigow on PM via secondary socks.

[Spanky]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
That's no way to cement friendships. Are they all from PAigow?

No: and there will be no more correspondence with Paigow. As she said: fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.

[nononono]

Originally posted by Spanky
No: and there will be no more correspondence with Paigow. As she said: fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.

Wow - you're a punisher!