Fashion Board 2-3-04 to 3-5-04

[Fugee]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by tmdiva
You're kidding, right? That song is a standard, made famous by Nat King Cole....

As far as her performance, well, she had nice energy, but the entire song was performed at the same level. And her nose is incredibly distracting and truly ugly. The thing is, if she makes it beyond this round (which I think unlikely), she'll become known enough that she wouldn't be able to get it fixed without people noticing.[QUOTE]

I have loved Orange Colored Sky since college and didn't even know it was a Nat King Cole song. A teacher used to play it. But it was a bad song choice for Katie -- it made her sound a little too musical revue. But I can't believe I never noticed that nose until you all mentioned it. I think she has a fun voice

None of the guys impressed me at all last night. Randy was right about Matthew -- he is cute but doesn't have the pipes to compete with even the others in his group. Marque and Erskine didn't pick the kind of songs that would showcase their strengths. I've forgotten their songs from last week so I can't decide whether I want either of them to move on.

Ashley has a nice voice but didn't wow me. I think she's done. Diana is young and it shows. But she can sing better than a lot of other teen girl singers with recording contracts.

I don't know why, but I like Jennifer Hudson even better than Fantasia though Fantasia has more stage presence.

Do they sing to tape tracks or live accompaniment? For several of them, it sounded like the accompaniment was setting the pace and not the singer and made the singer sound rushed. That would irritate me.

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
La di da, indeed. Do not let these petty people and their petty gender agreement get you down. Let us instead speak earnestly of our future plans and our life together.

So you're a Littler partner?

[bilmore]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
So you're a Littler partner?

What's this I hear of an e-mail?

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
So you're a Littler partner?

I'm not saying he is, but if he were, he would be able to make up for it in other ways.



(And not by being "slightly pooched around the mid-section.")

[leagleaze]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
I'm not saying he is, but if he were, he would be able to make up for it in other ways.



(And not by being "slightly pooched around the mid-section.")

My goodness, that is one hell of a letter. How humiliating.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
You are so right. And god, am I horny. I just can't get enough of you.

FB MAN PLEASER!

Keep it up.

We'll do the same.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
FB MAN PLEASER!

Keep it up.

We'll do the same.

Your post assumes (1) that there are men on the FB, and (2) that you are among them.

I'm in a generous mood, so I'll concede that only one of these assumptions is flawed.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Harvard okays student porn magazine; photos limited to Harvard undergraduates.

I shit you not.

Bonus fact: they stole the idea from Vassar.

This is going to devestate recruiting if we don't act now.
Next meeting of the Alumni Board Steering Committee, you and I have to shepard passage of a resolution insisting Admissions start giving Affirmative Action credit to women who shave at least some body hair, beginning this fall's entering class. I'm afraid the pace of change on campus has eclipsed our deliberate game plan to achieve diversity otherwise.
Hank Chinaski '91 Law '94

[Flinty_McFlint]

Originally posted by leagleaze
My goodness, that is one hell of a letter. How humiliating.

I posted the letter (from smackdaddy on the Stalin board) on the SF/SV forum, take a look. Damn Atticus, until this, you were my hero.

[Atticus Grinch]

Originally posted by leagleaze
My goodness, that is one hell of a letter. How humiliating.

FWIW, so as not to impugn the chastity of the Littler GAs among us, I have it on good authority that the female subject of the e-mail is not, in fact, an SF office associate, as had been reported.

I could be wrong about this, but I can say with authority that she's definitely not one of the SF associates listed on the Littler website, so Less can stop cruising that website for rebound sex.

Ladies of Littler, you may thank me later.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by leagleaze
My goodness, that is one hell of a letter. How humiliating.

Not least for the husband who told the world that he had been cuckolded by the poochy man.

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by leagleaze
My goodness, that is one hell of a letter. How humiliating.

Humiliating? If by that you mean having it posted on the internet has got to be bad bad bad for Mr. X and Ms. Y (and Mr. X's spouse -- Ms. Y's spouse seems to have wanted this sort of publicity for some reason), I have to agree.

As for the actual letter itself, I found it very sad. Sometimes (in the immortal words of J. Giles) "love stinks."

edited to correct the point I made about feeling bad for Mr. X's spouse.

[leagleaze]

One has to wonder how it is he intercepted the email in the first place. Could this woman have been so stupid as to leave it on a shared computer for him to see? Or could the guy who sent it have been so foolish to send it to a shared account?

Obviously this woman needs some work in her ability to be deceptive without leaving clues around.


I cannot imagine how mortified I would be if I were she. Both because the letter of course reveals she is cheating on her husband, and also, because it reveals that this guy she is cheating on him with is kinda smarmy.*

*Hey what does smarmy mean anyway?

And yes, I mean because the letter was revealed to other parties.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by leagleaze
One has to wonder how it is he intercepted the email in the first place. Could this woman have been so stupid as to leave it on a shared computer for him to see? Or could the guy who sent it have been so foolish to send it to a shared account?

Obviously this woman needs some work in her ability to be deceptive without leaving clues around.

I bet hubby was suspicious (maybe that explains the husband's described attitude when he, his wife, and her lover were somewhere together?) and signed into his wife's email account. She might have been careless about her password or he might have been crafty in getting it.

I have to thank hubby for his timing. With La Paigow's absence we need something to generate more responses around here! (And, is everybody busy at work, and not in the Littler sense?)

[Flinty_McFlint]

If that letter is the real deal, it couldn't have happened anywhere worse. For a partner and an associate at that firm to get caught doing this is not only embarassing to the parties involved, but to the firm. If I were another Littler partner, I'd be pissed.