Making Baby Jesus Cry

Originally posted by Not Bob
Apropos of Nothing, I now have Doctor Hook's "When You're In Love With a Beautiful Woman" playing on my mental soundtrack.

Now I do too. Merde!

Trifecta! Mon Dieu!!!

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
And lap dances. And cigars.

notbob can you link to an explaination of what this might mean?

[taxwonk]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
non-responsive to whom? An objective reader? Sorry you all bore shit out of an objective reader. Then the subjective interests of the people who read and respond? okay but that means that Penske and I as a team can justify each others posts by responding to each other. QED

Hank Chinaski
'88 Law '91

98-7

This is not your best material.

[taxwonk]

Originally posted by Spanky
For the plan to work, insurance companys will have to provide for emergency care. Then it will be in the insurance companys pecuniary interest to make sure that there are doctors at every ER covered by the plan. ER docs will only have two options. Be on the plans or dont' get paid. Every plan will cover all emergency situations, and non emergency situations you have to use the plans doctors. If you want your own doctors you pay may more. But there wills simply be no such thing as emergecy care paid for by individuals. So emergency physicians won't have that option. Actually the exception is if you make over a $100,000 a year and you don't have adequate insurance you are taken out back and shot. So I case under my plan you would have been taken out back and shot.

Actually, under your plan as you just described it, the ER doc wouldn't get paid. AS an alternative, I would be willing to live with him being taken out and shot. After I get my heparin, nitro and morphine, of course.

[sgtclub]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Yes. Why tie it to drivers' licenses? Why not issue licenses to breath--call them green cards--and make buying health insurance a condition of acquiring them?

There's the burger I once knew and loved. You've had me worried for some time now. Thought you'd abadoned your libertarian principles.

[Spanky]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Yes. Why tie it to drivers' licenses? Why not issue licenses to breath--call them green cards--and make buying health insurance a condition of acquiring them?

Do you believe you have a right to use the public roads? Do you think we should stop distributing driver's licenses? Don't you think that some price should be extracted from using the public roads otherwise it is a market distortion and is unfair to the railroads who are trying to complete against this public subsidy?

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Spanky
Do you believe you have a right to use the public roads? Do you think we should stop distributing driver's licenses? Don't you think that some price should be extracted from using the public roads otherwise it is a market distortion and is unfair to the railroads who are trying to complete against this public subsidy?

did you get this all from the drinking age in Louisiana and highway funding?

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by Spanky
Do you believe you have a right to use the public roads? Do you think we should stop distributing driver's licenses? Don't you think that some price should be extracted from using the public roads otherwise it is a market distortion and is unfair to the railroads who are trying to complete against this public subsidy?

The uninsured should also be denied entrance to public parks.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
The uninsured should also be denied entrance to public parks.

We could make the right to vote contingent on having health insurance . . .

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
We could make the right to vote contingent on having health insurance . . .

Excellent idea, but voting is actually a right and all. Maybe we could just require proof of insurance before people buy food. There's no right to food in the Constitution.

[SlaveNoMore]

Hank Chinaski
notbob can you link to an explaination of what this might mean?

This is not his best material either

[Penske_Account]

Dear Mrs. Clinton:

On December 16, 1998, your husband, the impeached President of the United States gave a speech to the nation (as excerpted below), which, based on Ty's bloggers' irrefutable evidence against current Commander in Chief Bush, was riddled with lies.

As we know Saddam was no threat and his WMDs were a sham. Never had em, never would have. No threat there. Further, the inspectors were not a sham, they are the only good actors in the process (except for the liberals' hero, the rightfully elected and unfairly maligned humanitarian leader, Saddam Hussein). Further, we also know bringing a new freely elected government to Iraq is not a worthy or noble goal and it should not take time if it was done (it should be done with no cost instaneously) Lies, lies, lies.

Clintons 1998 speech:

Good evening. Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.

Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.
Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them. Not once, but repeatedly.

The international community had little doubt then, and I have no doubt today, that left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again.

In short, the inspectors are saying that even if they could stay in Iraq, their work would be a sham. Saddam's deception has defeated their effectiveness. Instead of the inspectors disarming Saddam, Saddam has disarmed the inspectors.
Second, if Saddam can cripple the weapons inspection system and get away with it, he would conclude that the international community -- led by the United States -- has simply lost its will. He will surmise that he has free rein to rebuild his arsenal of destruction, and someday -- make no mistake -- he will use it again as he has in the past.

The credible threat to use force, and when necessary, the actual use of force, is the surest way to contain Saddam's weapons of mass destruction program, curtail his aggression.
The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world. The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government

Bringing change in Baghdad will take time and effort.

And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them.
Because we're acting today, it is less likely that we will face these dangers in the future.

Mrs. Clinton, please don't be a LIAR like your husband. Please answer the below question honestly:

"Senator, if the voters of NY send you back to the Senate, will you pledge to serve a full term???



That's right, think beeeyotch, think!

[Penske_Account]

Cindy Sheehan - Attempting to Erase HistoryThe crazy hate-filled woman who happened to give birth to a patriot is rather peeved.


It appears the blogosphere galaxy of the internet universe (as created by Al Gore) has uncovered additional evidence of the crazed lunacy and deceit of Cindy Sheehan. A typical liberal liar.

It seems not only has she met President Bush before and spoken highly of him:

“I now know he’s sincere about wanting freedom for the Iraqis,” Cindy said after their meeting. “I know he’s sorry and feels some pain for our loss. And I know he’s a man of faith.”

And not only have pictures now come to light evidencing the warmth and compassion of the meeting:





[Fyi, that is Bush kissing Cindy.]

But now, as above, the blogosphere has uncovered the evidence of Cindy's attempt to revise history to cover up the uncovered events.

Shame, shame. What dishonour to a noble son. No wonder her family can't stand her.

[Penske_Account]

And you too Hillary!

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Penske_Account

In the history of the United States how many military personnel have been KIA? 2 million? How many of them have had mothers that were adversely impacted? (did you see Prv. Ryan?) about 1.9 million?

Do all 1.9 million have a right to a policy briefing from the POTUS?

Did Clinton meet with the moms of the young men and women he let die for naught on the USS Cole?

Why is this a story any more than the people who live in Lafayette Park and want to meet with the President?