Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I hate when people say this. If they hit their free throws, the game would have been completely different. Both teams would have approached each possession differently. Syracuse would have been in attack mode instead of maintain mode. So, who knows what the outcome would have been. Kansas still might have lost.

Kind of like, "If Marilyn were breaking into the movies today," no?

r(couldn't resist)p

[barely_legal]

The whipped cream was on the nipples.

Oh, and I forgot, the two strippers who showed up to the bachelor party claimed to be sisters, and were very touchy with each other. Although they were probably lying, is there a bigger market for incestuous strippers?

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Kind of like, "If Marilyn were breaking into the movies today," no?

No, baby. Not like that at all.

Thurgreed(but nice try)Marshall

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by Alex_de_Large
*blushing*

If I had know it was this easy, I would have laid down my best Hubie Brown at bars...

I said the same thing to you last week and got a totally different response. And you don't even know that, er, if I have cankles.

[Alex_de_Large]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I hate when people say this. If they hit their free throws, the game would have been completely different. Both teams would have approached each possession differently. Syracuse would have been in attack mode instead of maintain mode. So, who knows what the outcome would have been. Kansas still might have lost.

You prove my point, TM. Kansas' making fts changes the game entirely, if not necessarily the outcome. I probably shouldn't have used that word, though I think that Kansas had the better team but got outplayed.

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I think T-Mac has more offensive skills than any player in the history of basketball. He is the new prototype... if he follows Jordan's career blue print, he'll be better than Jordan ever was.

I had my doubts about him in Toronto. I have no more doubts. He is the most gifted player in the Association, bar none, and he has shown the will to improve and to win. I also think that Doc Rivers is a good coach for him. If the GM (it's not Dr. J, is it?) can put together a strong front court for him, Orlando will be playing against Parker and Duncan for those rings.

As far as the NBA goes, it doesn't get more fashionable than Clyde:

[evenodds]

B_L, enough with the taunting.

How about a summary for those of us watching the championship game (I only caught the last 15 minutes)?

[tmdiva]

Originally posted by jeezlouise
for me, I find the difficulty with women's clothes is not the mismatching, but that they just aren't readily available in sizes that fit me at all - 6'4", 56" chest, 42" hips, but then again, I am a guy, so why am I complaining?

jl

Hey--you that coke can guy I dated in law school?

tm

[Alex_de_Large]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
I said the same thing to you last week and got a totally different response. And you don't even know that, er, if I have cankles.

Well, do you?

If you're a fan of robust puppies, you're very happy right now...

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by barely_legal
The whipped cream was on the nipples.

Oh, and I forgot, the two strippers who showed up to the bachelor party claimed to be sisters, and were very touchy with each other. Although they were probably lying, is there a bigger market for incestuous strippers?

Whipped cream on the nipples = pretty standard at the bachelor parties I've attended. Although whip cream in other areas (two other areas to be exact! - I didn't partake) has occurred about half the time as well. Are you sure the two "strippers" weren't really "lesbian entertainers with toys" or something?

There's a difference.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
No. You should be happy this is all they did. But you shouldn't have even have found that out. If fiance/e told, they are nuts and you shouldn't marry them. If you found out another way and fiance/e didn't flat out deny, they are stupid and you shouldn't marry them. If they cop to the kiss, assume much worse was done.



Yez. Tongue on skin is much worse (depending on what you're licking) than almost-grinding through pants with a stripper (depending on which strip club you go to).

Thurgreed(but of course, the hypocritical oath attaches here)Marshall

Agree with TM. The licking thing is also worse because it is an affirmative act. I might not be bothered by my fiance's failure to physically remove the stripper from his lap, but I would throw his clothes out on the lawn if he failed to keep his tongue away from her AND if he were stupid enough to tell me that he so failed.

There would not be enough Listerine in the world to erase the memory of that. Every time he came near me with his tongue after that I'd think about the cooties. The relationship would then, obviously, be dead.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by Alex_de_Large
Well, do you?

No, I don't have cankles. But after Sebby's post I must admit I checked. I hate when I become aware of new possible flaws.

If you're a fan of robust puppies, you're very happy right now...

There are a few ways this can be interpreted. ??

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
No, I don't have cankles. But after Sebby's post I must admit I checked. I hate when I become of new possible flaws.



?

Cankles are bad. Thankles (thigh-calf-ankle) are worse.

[purse junkie]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Agree with TM. The licking thing is also worse because it is an affirmative act. I might not be bothered by my fiance's failure to physically remove the stripper from his lap, but I would throw his clothes out on the lawn if he failed to keep his tongue away from her AND if he were stupid enough to tell me that he so failed.

There would not be enough Listerine in the world to erase the memory of that. Every time he came near me with his tongue after that I'd think about the cooties. The relationship would then, obviously, be dead.

Two tests:

1. Would it be okay with em if *you* do that with a stripper at your party (disregarding whether you actually plan to)? If not, em's gone for being a double-standardizing hypocrite.

2. A full round of medical tests, in case em's lying. Even the tongue in a sex-trade worker's mouth is a matter for concern. Any problems, em's gone for taking stupid risks at your expense for their own entertainment.

p(fastidious)j

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
The licking thing is also worse because it is an affirmative act. I might not be bothered by my fiance's failure to physically remove the stripper from his lap, . . . .

So the "but I didn't kiss back" defense has some currency? Or the "I just lay there and let him have his way with me" response is acceptable? Those strippers, as we all know, cling like fly-paper, though.

I can see the intimacy distinction, but not the passive/active one. If he had his pants on during the lap dance, there's a protective barrier (well, protective in a teen-idiot sense, or metaphysical), but tongue on skin just doesn't have that.

Anyway, what happened to the "what happened at the bachelor party stays at the bachelor party" rule? Em is ruining it for everyone!!

[Alex_de_Large]

Originally posted by robustpuppy ?

Sorry, Hubie Brown joke. Weren't you afraid of me or something?

BTW, I am glad you don't have cankles. Cankles remind me of an elephant's feet.