» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 910 |
0 members and 910 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |
|
 |
|
04-19-2020, 04:59 PM
|
#1366
|
Wearing the cranky pants
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,120
|
Re: Boston's Healthy Homeless
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icky Thump
Sorry, if you’ve missed my 90 posts on this. If you could test and isolate you’re talking 4 weeks to Opening Day.
|
<Chortle> I've seen your posts, and that is why I made that point. Not so much testing for the virus itself, though, but testing for antibodies to show whether it is so endemic that the removal of restrictions would not cause a spike of cases the system cannot handle.
__________________
Boogers!
|
|
|
04-19-2020, 05:01 PM
|
#1367
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
|
the guy who had to switch jobs, because he insisted on saying the n word in lectures?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=409Pjtq7jzY
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
04-19-2020, 05:04 PM
|
#1368
|
Wearing the cranky pants
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,120
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icky Thump
Sorry not the school rule. Just “Common Sense for White People”.
|
Should white American lit profs use the revised version of Huckleberry Finn? Should a law professor teach Cohen v. California by saying that Cohen's jacket said "F" the police?
__________________
Boogers!
|
|
|
04-19-2020, 05:21 PM
|
#1369
|
Wearing the cranky pants
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,120
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
|
Or the guy who is such a respected scholar that he is the only non-Berkeley, Yale, or Harvard prof in the top-10 of cited Con Law professors, and the only one under 60 years old. https://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/...2013-2017.html
If I had had a Con Law professor in law school who self-censored Supreme Court opinions, I would have asked to be transferred to another class. If I had a dean who apologized for him quoting US Supreme Court opinions, I would never donate to that school for so long as that person was dean. And, if you are wondering, I have sent Jennifer an e-mail saying just this and how disappointed I was in her.
__________________
Boogers!
|
|
|
04-19-2020, 06:17 PM
|
#1370
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,568
|
Re: Boston's Healthy Homeless
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
<Chortle> I've seen your posts, and that is why I made that point. Not so much testing for the virus itself, though, but testing for antibodies to show whether it is so endemic that the removal of restrictions would not cause a spike of cases the system cannot handle.
|
Nah. They are not sure about what antibodies mean and it’s incredibly common to have antibodies AND test positive nasal swab. Test for contagiousness and act accordingly.
__________________
gothamtakecontrol
|
|
|
04-19-2020, 06:33 PM
|
#1371
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
I have sent Jennifer an e-mail saying just this and how disappointed I was in her.
|
Plus, having to deal with all those cali liberals? Puhleeze.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
04-19-2020, 08:37 PM
|
#1372
|
Wearing the cranky pants
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,120
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
Plus, having to deal with all those cali liberals? Puhleeze.
|
I hope she's paid well, but I am sure it is way less than what it would take for me to be agree to be the dean of a law school, let alone a public one in California.
__________________
Boogers!
|
|
|
04-19-2020, 08:42 PM
|
#1373
|
Wearing the cranky pants
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,120
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
I hope she's paid well, but I am sure it is way less than what it would take for me to be agree to be the dean of a law school, let alone a public one in California.
|
Ah, the internet and public institutions. According to some website, she was paid $524,806 in 2018. Not enough for me.
__________________
Boogers!
|
|
|
04-19-2020, 08:45 PM
|
#1374
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
Ah, the internet and public institutions. According to some website, she was paid $524,806 in 2018. Not enough for me.
|
Egg-zactly
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
04-19-2020, 09:20 PM
|
#1375
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
So a black prof can accurately quote a US Supreme Court opinion, but a white one cannot? UCLA is a state school. You have just given Professor Volokh a cause of action.
|
She didn't say he couldn't say it, did she? Why can't they agree to disagree? There is no right answer.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
04-19-2020, 09:45 PM
|
#1376
|
Wearing the cranky pants
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,120
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
She didn't say he couldn't say it, did she? Why can't they agree to disagree? There is no right answer.
|
Reread. I was responding to Icky's comment, not her. Although, given that UCLA is a public institution, her apology for his absolutely truthful, protected speech might be actionable.
__________________
Boogers!
Last edited by LessinSF; 04-19-2020 at 09:49 PM..
|
|
|
04-20-2020, 01:43 PM
|
#1377
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
Reread. I was responding to Icky's comment, not her. Although, given that UCLA is a public institution, her apology for his absolutely truthful, protected speech might be actionable.
|
I would hope that they could agree respectfully to disagree. This is what right and left did (and quite well) where I went to law school.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
04-20-2020, 01:56 PM
|
#1378
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I would hope that they could agree respectfully to disagree. This is what right and left did (and quite well) where I went to law school.
|
I remember coming into second term 1L Con Law. We had grown to be a tight group, night school, all in this together etc. I was wondering what Right of Privacy would do to us. I mean we had a Newt Gingrich aide in our class. But people analyzed the cases without much comment- other than one guy who had like 4 kids saying he thought a father should have some say. Anyway, we got past that. All good- what a tight team we were!
There was this little guy, I think an ensign, who always came to class in dress whites. So Prof is wrapping the topic up. 2 weeks no fights! We are moving on to commerce or some such.
Prof: anyone have any last questions on privacy?
Ensign's hand goes up: the thing that none of us get, is, it's killing babies. Why can't they see that?
I thought the "none of us" part was precious. It led to some heated follow up, I'll tell you.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
04-20-2020, 01:57 PM
|
#1379
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,280
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
So do any of you use gloves? They just seem a way to spread the virus to everything you touch. At the market I'm bare handed grabbing stuff, disinfecting before I touch anything (say my debit card) that must stay clean. And I use a dog poop bag when entering my PIN. A dog poop bag seems better for what good a glove can do- not touching stuff that has lots pf people touching it- and the bag throws away easier.
|
I'm not using gloves. I don't have a ton to change all the time and I am handwashing/sanitizing instead. I bought a stylus for any touch screens I need to interact with. (I sent a bunch to my family too.) Wipe down everything when I bring it home and throw away packaging (which goes against my recycling nature, but I'm sure the carbon offset has been more than met this month).
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
|
|
|
04-20-2020, 02:31 PM
|
#1380
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Anyone want to go in on some crude oil futures? I'm thinking that buying at 0 has some upside.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|