Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03 - Page 980

Replaced_Texan · 07-22-2003, 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I think we need a larger sample size of males, if we are going to have three different women. Though, I guess the hookers are probably actually lesbians (so may not give the best blow jobs, particularly from the bunnyranch (isn't that the one that was in trailer homes? maybe I misremember)) so using the skanky street hooker may be even. Surely we can find some guy who's looking for a toaster.

We could just throw it out to craigslist and see what we get back. Hell, if we play our cards right, the blowers might pay us to participate in this little contest.

notcasesensitive · 07-22-2003, 07:08 PM

or as some of you might know her, Miss Vermont, has dropped the lawsuit against Tucker Max. So the story is back on his website. I have wasted much of my afternoon learning about Katy. Turns out I've seen her on tv before (Mtv's Made - I want to be a beauty queen). If you want to know more about Katy, here is a link to her website -- http://www.katyjohnson.com/. Some scary stuff there. Lotsa rhyming though...

ltl/fb · 07-22-2003, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
We could just throw it out to craigslist and see what we get back. Hell, if we play our cards right, the blowers might pay us to participate in this little contest.

Ahem, it's a fundraiser. Where's your charitable impulse?

Who's going to pre-test the blowers?

evenodds · 07-22-2003, 07:14 PM

Her episode of Made was awful.

I watched with morbid fascination since I had already read the Miss Vermont story. Still I was surprised by what a beeyotch she was to that girl.

Replaced_Texan · 07-22-2003, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Ahem, it's a fundraiser. Where's your charitable impulse?

Raising money for notforprofits can be hard. If we extract cash from the participants, more money for the charity. I was thinking about covering the operating expenses.

Plus, think about what the winner of this little contest will get: an endorsement from SD himself on em's blowing ability. Surely that is a great gift that we are giving.

Quote:

Who's going to pre-test the blowers?

I think it's only fair that a gay man gets to be blown too, to ensure that whoever is determined to be the champion blower gets the honor from both sides of the fence.

NotFromHere · 07-22-2003, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
What are we raising funds for?

The PEPSI CHALLENGE. Please try to keep up. We're only $4750 short according to my calculation.

I say we make it a contest since SD said women were clearly better. If we give a guy enough incentive - we'll see if he can win this thing.

notcasesensitive · 07-22-2003, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
Her episode of Made was awful.

I watched with morbid fascination since I had already read the Miss Vermont story. Still I was surprised by what a beeyotch she was to that girl.

I knew about the Miss Vermont story but didn't know it was her when I watched Made. I thought it was funny when she made the girl bake a cake for the gym guy. Apparently that is what beauty queens do to apologize. Also I liked the fake smile and introduction courses. My name is Katy! And I hail from the beautiful state of Vermont!!

ltl/fb · 07-22-2003, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
The PEPSI CHALLENGE. Please try to keep up. We're only $4750 short according to my calculation.

I say we make it a contest since SD said women were clearly better. If we give a guy enough incentive - we'll see if he can win this thing.

What's the Pepsi Challenge? Am I going to get a lifetime supply of Diet Pepsi out of this? Nifty!

Atticus Grinch · 07-22-2003, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
I say we make it a contest since SD said women were clearly better. If we give a guy enough incentive - we'll see if he can win this thing.

Folks, I don't want to get everybody too excited, but I just got an e-mail from a producer at Fox who says that a certain network is interested in broadcast rights. They're tentatively titling it "Cocksucker Challenge: Girls v. Guys," but one of the Harvard nerds in S&P is suggesting they go with "Fellatio: I Blew Him Well" instead.

Right now the concern is that it might run as short as the Tyson v. Frazier fight in 1986, making sponsors difficult to obtain.

They've still got to float the trial balloons with a few of the major ad accounts, but I've got a really good feeling about this.

NotFromHere · 07-22-2003, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Folks, I don't want to get everybody too excited, but I just got an e-mail from a producer at Fox who says that a certain network is interested in broadcast rights. They're tentatively titling it "Cocksucker Challenge: Girls v. Guys," but one of the Harvard nerds in S&P is suggesting they go with "Fellatio: I Blew Him Well" instead.

Tell Fox if we can call it "Fellatio Hornblower" then we've got a deal. What we could do is nominate people from the audience and then we could vote as to this week's challenger. Every week we boot 1 man or woman out (ala that stupid hotel show).

Quote:

posted by ltl/fb
What's the Pepsi Challenge? Am I going to get a lifetime supply of Diet Pepsi out of this? Nifty!

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Penske's right. You're gonna have to take the pepsi challenge.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This worm has certainly turned against me.

S(Pay the airfare and get the pot up to $5K and I'm in)D

__________________

ABBAKiss · 07-22-2003, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
"Cocksucker Challenge: Girls v. Guys," or "Fellatio: I Blew Him Well"

I'll work on the Warming K-Y people.

Also, the second title is much better. Sounds classier.

evenodds · 07-22-2003, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Right now the concern is that it might run as short as the Tyson v. Frazier fight in 1986, making sponsors difficult to obtain.

They've still got to float the trial balloons with a few of the major ad accounts, but I've got a really good feeling about this.

Advertising should not be a problem. We'll announce a half-hour pre-game show where we can invite a panel of sexologists and feminist scholars and then we'll actually have the contest start 45 minutes after the declared time. That's at least 1.25 hours we can book for ads. Plus you'll have the change-over time during the competition, so that adds another 4 commercial slots.

It's perfect!

ltl/fb · 07-22-2003, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
I'll work on the Warming K-Y people.

Also, the second title is much better. Sounds classier.

The second title is TOO classy. It may alienate a key demographic, proles.

I am with Atticus on the worry about it not lasting long enough to fill all the time allotted. Maybe we can have a lot of build-up and hype, like when Geraldo opened that secret room (and found nada).

I think there's also room for a "pre-game" piece on fluffers.

ltl/fb · 07-22-2003, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
Plus you'll have the change-over time during the competition, so that adds another 4 commercial slots.

It's perfect!

Is it really fair to run commercials every 2 minutes?

NotFromHere · 07-22-2003, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
Advertising should not be a problem. We'll announce a half-hour pre-game show where we can invite a panel of sexologists and feminist scholars and then we'll actually have the contest start 45 minutes after the declared time. That's at least 1.25 hours we can book for ads. Plus you'll have the change-over time during the competition, so that adds another 4 commercial slots.

It's perfect!

Well here's a thought. What if uh, we/he can only "service" 1 contestant? Then we'll really need the filler on fluffers.