LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 197
0 members and 197 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-18-2005, 12:03 PM   #3368
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
BORING ALERT: NET WORTH TEAM MEMBERS SHOULD SCROLL

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
If you are actually advocating eliminating the corporate income tax and shifting to a consumption tax, then you can definitely forget. The rates would be so high that Britney Spears would have to do her shopping at Wal-Mart out of necessity rather than choice.
There was a time when consumption taxes made up a large part of government revenue. That time effectively ended with the Deal and, more importantly, World War II.

Burger, is your proposal that we return to a government that looks and operates as it did in the 30s? Many conservatives have long argued for drying up revenue and letting expenses follow. It strikes me that your proposal, with revenues coming in on the back end but heavily deferred by exempting savings on the front end, is a set up for such a shift in spending.
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 AM.