LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,156
0 members and 3,156 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-18-2005, 01:03 PM   #11
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
BORING ALERT: NET WORTH TEAM MEMBERS SHOULD SCROLL

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
If you are actually advocating eliminating the corporate income tax and shifting to a consumption tax, then you can definitely forget. The rates would be so high that Britney Spears would have to do her shopping at Wal-Mart out of necessity rather than choice.
There was a time when consumption taxes made up a large part of government revenue. That time effectively ended with the Deal and, more importantly, World War II.

Burger, is your proposal that we return to a government that looks and operates as it did in the 30s? Many conservatives have long argued for drying up revenue and letting expenses follow. It strikes me that your proposal, with revenues coming in on the back end but heavily deferred by exempting savings on the front end, is a set up for such a shift in spending.
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 AM.