LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 155
0 members and 155 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-06-2005, 05:30 PM   #2654
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
If there were anything to this, then the SEC or the CFTC would have investigated. A big, one-time trade by a lawyer that suggests insider trading will be reviewed, even if the dollars involved are much smaller.
It's not insider trading. The mechanism is simple--take positions on a regular basis during periods of fluctuations. Some positions will go up; others will go down. Net they'll probably wash, or go down slightly (transaction fees). Change the name on one account, with post-dating. If you do it right, it's the one that goes up. Nothing illegal about it from a trading perspective. The claim of smell related to someone doing her a favor--i.e., it was a campaign donation in disguise. And by "campaign donation" I mean a thank you to her husband for some favorable legislation. And by "thank you" I mean payoff. So it might violate RICO or some state contributions law, but it's not a securities violation.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 AM.