LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 143
0 members and 143 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-06-2005, 05:30 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
If there were anything to this, then the SEC or the CFTC would have investigated. A big, one-time trade by a lawyer that suggests insider trading will be reviewed, even if the dollars involved are much smaller.
It's not insider trading. The mechanism is simple--take positions on a regular basis during periods of fluctuations. Some positions will go up; others will go down. Net they'll probably wash, or go down slightly (transaction fees). Change the name on one account, with post-dating. If you do it right, it's the one that goes up. Nothing illegal about it from a trading perspective. The claim of smell related to someone doing her a favor--i.e., it was a campaign donation in disguise. And by "campaign donation" I mean a thank you to her husband for some favorable legislation. And by "thank you" I mean payoff. So it might violate RICO or some state contributions law, but it's not a securities violation.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15 AM.