LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 83
0 members and 83 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-07-2008, 02:27 PM   #4928
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
2.

sebby said with universla care you can always pay for better. I said not true.

I don't think you can disagree with us both.
Dude, I just read up a little bit about the Canadian plan. It is presently a two tiered plan, and it works a lot like traditional private insurance. Docs who accept govt pay for any procedure cannot accept a private payment for the same procedure, but a patient and doc can opt out for any given procedure, and there are private clinics around the country which do strictly fee for service or insurance payment work.

"Two tiered" is not the same thing as a scenario where the govt "bans all private insurance." I think you're reading too much Heritage Foundation info on the issue. From what I see, we would get a two tiered system.

The "debate," whether that's good or bad, is another issue.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 01-07-2008 at 02:35 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 AM.