LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,895
0 members and 2,895 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 12,534, 02-14-2026 at 02:04 PM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-07-2008, 01:27 PM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
2.

sebby said with universla care you can always pay for better. I said not true.

I don't think you can disagree with us both.
Dude, I just read up a little bit about the Canadian plan. It is presently a two tiered plan, and it works a lot like traditional private insurance. Docs who accept govt pay for any procedure cannot accept a private payment for the same procedure, but a patient and doc can opt out for any given procedure, and there are private clinics around the country which do strictly fee for service or insurance payment work.

"Two tiered" is not the same thing as a scenario where the govt "bans all private insurance." I think you're reading too much Heritage Foundation info on the issue. From what I see, we would get a two tiered system.

The "debate," whether that's good or bad, is another issue.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 01-07-2008 at 01:35 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 AM.