LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 121
1 members and 120 guests
Hank Chinaski
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-13-2004, 06:35 PM   #11
Secret_Agent_Man
Classified
 
Secret_Agent_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: You Never Know . . .
Posts: 4,266
general pet peeve (comments from Chicagoans?)

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
Read more carefully.

As I said, I participate in, and buy into, such policy, supporting those programs, as well as charitable stuff. My beef was with the philosophy that holds it to be, not a mark of my social conscience, but my moral obligation to do so. Remember, I was objecting to the phrase "my share of the burden". I think it's fair to call it charity. It's not my burden.
A lot of people view social conscience and moral obligation to be roughly equivalent. I'm not sure I understand the distinction you make -- r perhaps the way you're using the terms. (I would say, for example, that folks are morally obliged to have, and act on, a social conscience.) Seems like a matter of semantics, but OK.

In defense of my reading comprehension, the point you responded with was in your second post on the issue, not the first, and I am notorious for failing to stp.

S_A_M
__________________
"Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace."

Voted Second Most Helpful Poster on the Politics Board.
Secret_Agent_Man is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:24 PM.