LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 106
0 members and 106 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-13-2004, 08:41 PM   #11
Say_hello_for_me
Theo rests his case
 
Say_hello_for_me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: who's askin?
Posts: 1,632
general pet peeve (comments from Chicagoans?)

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Maybe I misunderstood Hello, but I thought all he was saying was that it's bad for Chicago that you can't use Section 8 vouchers in more places, and that other neighborhoods should step up to the plate.
Not at all misunderstood, though my position is that the recipients should absolutely be prohibited from concentrating in any community. If it means subsidizing the rent of some family to move to an 8000 square foot mansion in Lake Forest, so be it. If anyone is willing to accept rent, than Section 8 should not be denied uniformly and automatically. Well, ok, maybe that's off the deep end.

Of course, if a community has no renters, than maybe the program can buy homes and *rent* them to the recipients for a few years.

Of course, there should be a lifetime limit of section 8 use for able-bodies adults too, just like the limits on receipt of welfare aid.

Bottom line is that poverty should not be concentrated at the hands of the G.

Hello
__________________
Man, back in the day, you used to love getting flushed, you'd be all like 'Flush me J! Flush me!' And I'd be like 'Nawww'

Say_hello_for_me is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 PM.