Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Let me get this straight.
You want to ignore the plain language and look to the "implication"
Whenver Kerry says crap about a "global test", you want us to ignore the implications and look to the actual words he says.
Just trying to keep track here.
|
You and I both know that Cheney strung those two sentences together -- the one about presiding over the Senate and the one about being up at the Senate most Tuesdays -- to give people the impression that in his official role, he hadn't met Edwards. He was misleading people. I'm not saying I inferred. I'm not saying that there was an implication. I'm saying Cheney was implying it.
And the problem with your "implication" about the "global test" is that Kerry explicitly rejected the "implication" -- inference, really -- that you guys want to draw. Not that it'll stop you. Jon Stewart has my proxy on this one.
Threaded Mode