LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,213
0 members and 3,213 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-06-2004, 07:01 PM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
There was a debate????

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I ignored your post for a reason. Being the smartest at politics is different than being the smartest generally speaking. And if I refuse to change my positions because I live in a red state where all I have to do to win is say, "I will reduce taxes," [primarily for the rich without regard to the consequences], it doesn't make me stupid. It makes me principled.

TM
You're right, but thats not what the left is saying. They keep screaming about how dumb Bush or the voters are, as though the winner were to be decided based on which side has the most combined IQ points, when it knows full well that's not the way the game is played. I say its pretty dumb to engage in a game where you know you'll lose if you refuse to follow the rules, lose, and subsequently blame the game. Thats not being principled at all - thats being dumb. If they were objectively smart, they'd beat Bush at his own game.

Principle's a funny animal. I'd say it unfortunately has very little application in a debate about the smartness of political campaigns.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.