Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
The point is that the DEMs instituted a process based on faulty assumptions.
|
Which are?
Quote:
|
Instead of living with the results of a close election, like say 1960, they were so desperate to hold on to power that they jeapardized the very system. Unfortunately, they seem poised to do it again. Aside from my post this morning, I understand that the complaints in several states have already been written and the legal teams already assembled. Unless Bush has some comfort in a win (assuming, that is, that he in fact wins), it is going to be another ugly December.
|
Peculiarities of Fla election law aside, in your mind is there a point at which the conduct of a hypothetical election would be so tainted so as to justify a recount or court action? Or is it just that the loser has to swallow it if it goes wrong, for the good of the system?
My understanding is that both sides have retained the legal teams. I look forward to reposting your words after Kerry's victory.
edited to fix atrocious grammar
Threaded Mode