LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,214
0 members and 2,214 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-25-2004, 04:57 PM   #11
Shape Shifter
World Ruler
 
Shape Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,057
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
1) By all accounts other than the NYT, the material was moved before the invasion began.
Not this one:

At the Pentagon (news - web sites), an official who monitors developments in Iraq said U.S.-led coalition troops had searched Al-Qaqaa in the immediate aftermath of the March 2003 invasion and confirmed that the explosives, under IAEA seal since 1991, were intact. Thereafter, the site was not secured by U.S. forces, the official said, also speaking on condition of anonymity.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp..._agency_iraq_7

Quote:
2) The material at issue was required to be destroyed by Saddam under the umpteen UN Security Council Resolutions that he was ignoring. The IAEA did nothing about it.
a. Not true; and

b. Irrelevant. Why were they not secured?

I find the adminstration's response less than reassuring:

"There are hundreds of tons of other weapons and munitions missing around the country, and it is impossible for the United States to track down all of them, [a senior administration] official said."

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/...ves/index.html
__________________
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."
Shape Shifter is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50 AM.