LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,923
0 members and 2,923 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-12-2005, 05:10 PM   #11
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
Surprising

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
You're right! I was looking for the spending cuts that would reflect the fiscal prudence of the supply siders, but I think I must have left it under the Iraqi WMD.

On a serious note, if the supply-side theory is correct -- that tax cuts "pay for themselves" because of the economic growth they create -- then there is no need for spending cuts to control the deficit. The supply-siders sure act as if that conclusion is true.
You really are going for "Cutest Poster of the Day" aren't you.

Huh? The paying for itself aspect (if, indeed, supply side theory even reaches that conclusion) means that there should be no revenue deficit purely as a result of the tax cuts. It does not mean that there isn't a need for spending prudence. If there was a deficit before the tax cuts, the tax cut is not a cure all.
sgtclub is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 PM.