LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,215
0 members and 2,215 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-18-2005, 08:04 PM   #11
Sidd Finch
I am beyond a rank!
 
Sidd Finch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,873
Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
And, "choices"? Individual investors who can't spend tons of time on research, or who don't have the skills to do research, don't do well picking investments. So, practically speaking, we'll end up with ten or so government-approved boring, safe, low-return investment vehicles. Why not just go back to the lockbox approach, and save all the mess of setting up a new system?

2. And individual investors who are poor, and therefore most likley to be fully dependent on SS, and for whom the risk of losing money in a private account will be losing any means of supporting themselves in retirement or their survivors after death, should make the most conservative choices. Bringing their returns pretty close to .... well, SS returns. But at much higher administrative cost.
Sidd Finch is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 AM.