LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,151
0 members and 1,151 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-23-2005, 08:57 PM   #11
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
bad news, club

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
But does that benefit outweight the taking? New condos substituted for old homes does not IMHO.
Does it "outweigh" what? The property owners must be compensated, so it only happens if someone in charge thinks the redeveloped land is worth more.

And new condos are usually worth more than old homes. You may like slums and urban blight, but most people like to see money spent to develop cities.

Quote:
Don't get me wrong, I think a RR, much like a freeway, is in the public interest, but it strikes me as different if the land that is the subject of the taking is not owned by the government - it then starts to look like redistribution or a micromanaged econmony.
I think you'll find that railroads were given huge tracts of land, but I don't know.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:40 AM.