LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 143
0 members and 143 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-29-2005, 05:26 PM   #11
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
More tyranny I like

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
The SCOTUS standard that the taking must be for local community betterment is easily met. Any scumbag planning board can decide a development is in the "community interest."
You don't seem to be talking about Kennedy's concurrence, which specifically addresses the circumstances in which a local government looks like it's acting at the behest of a specific private party. Kennedy lists reasons why those concerns did not apply here. I think I quoted those paragraphs of his decision a few days ago. Since the decision was 5-4, I think it's safe to say that his concurrence can't be ignored.

If local governments are making bad decisions, the remedy is to elect better local governments, not to interpret the Constitution to prevent them from acting at all.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15 AM.