LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 150
0 members and 150 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-06-2005, 05:08 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Yes I used to think that to. But one of me employees is a former option commodities trader and she told me that with the way commodities fluctuate and when people bet on margin there can be huge profits and losses. If you have ten dollars, borrow ninety, and bet 100, and you double your bet, you really have made $190 on a ten dollar bet. Of course it can happend the other way. What my employee thinks is that Hillary got lucky on a position, realized how crazy the whole thing is, and pulled out. Of course this all assumes she took positions on margin. Which I have never been able to verify.
I don't think anyone doubts that the profits weren't of the type one could earn in that area, esp. with margin (but even without). What people doubt is that Hillary really happened to "get lucky" on the position, and that's why it smells.

If she did in fact "get lucky" with that position, there were probably 10 other positions that she didn't get lucky with, but all of those were in someone else's name, and not transferred to her account, whereas the one gainer was transferred.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39 AM.