» Site Navigation |
|
|
|
» Online Users: 2,862 |
| 0 members and 2,862 guests |
| No Members online |
| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM. |
|
07-28-2005, 11:34 AM
|
#11
|
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Am I too old
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
ETA: I note a lot of people use this "in a way" caveat lately. I hear it a lot in convos. Which "way" is it referring to? I assume it implies something pathetic in one way is something other than pathetic in another way. But you refuse to disclose how many "ways" there are, and how many many other "things" (pathetic, abstruse, impolite, erogenous...) the object referred to can be. It's like ending the concert on a Dark Star teaser. You can't leave those loosse ends untied.
|
PREACH ON, MY BROTHER!
TM |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 AM.
Threaded Mode