LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 953
0 members and 953 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-10-2005, 02:39 PM   #11
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
I should also point out that the Republicans that voted against Clinton's NAFTA proposal were being partisan. NAFTA had a lot of labour and environmental regulations but it was overwhelmingly a free trade agreement (althought it did not come close to created a level playing field as Ty would want it). The business community was solidly behind it. The Republicans that came out against it because it wasn't "really free trade" were realy just chossing partisanship over principle. They came out against it because Clinton signed it. On CAFTA there were some Republicans that are not really pro-free trade who voted for it because they just wanted to give Bush a win. They were being partisan also.
Spanky is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 AM.