Making Baby Jesus Cry

[nononono]

You're onto me. Just too clever.

Originally posted by Not Bob
Yet more proof that nononono is Not Me. Also, Not Me used to mention her implants regularly. We've heard nothing from nononono on implants, and I don't even think that she has used the expression "hoo-ha" to refer to her, well, hoo-ha.

Clearly, this misdirection is a clever ruse to hide the fact that she is a Not Me sock. QED.

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by nononono
You're onto me. Just too clever.

Aren't you supposed to slink off in shame?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan


Bill Moyer, 73, wears a "Bullshit Protector" flap over his ear while President George W. Bush addresses the Veterans of Foreign Wars. (AP Photo/Douglas C. Pizac)

Ha, yet more proof that the fetid Legacy of Clinton has permeated even the most sanctified reaches of culture such that this man is forgetting who his Commander in Chief is.

Disrespectful. Sad.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by nononono
You're onto me. Just too clever.

Wow, busted. How's the hoo haa hanging?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I apologize.......

this is a step in the Right direction. More than Hillary has ever done.

[sgtclub]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
The sex addict is in White House
The sex addict is in White House
selling missile secrets and futures options and graft
Got to keep the benjies on the path

The sex addict cums in the sink
The sex addict cums in the sink
The papers prove his crimes, nails him to the floor
And every day Vince Foster admits more

And if Sadamm kicks inspectors out too soon
And if al queda's in Afghanistan
And if our ships explode with dark forboding booms
We'll not see another Dem admin anytime soon

The sex addict gets partial head
The sex addict gets partial head
You soil the dress and make a stain
You lie until there's DNA
You define a word
And throw out integrity
There’s someone getting head but it’s not me.

And if the embassy bombs, thunder in our ears
You build a wall over which no one seems to hear
And if your aides rob the archives rooms
We’ll not see another Dem admin anytime soon

Bravo, Bravo

[nononono]

Originally posted by Not Bob
Aren't you supposed to slink off in shame?

I've no idea. I'm not feeling slinky, though.

[nononono]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Wow, busted. How's the hoo haa hanging?

Wow, not. Late night?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by nononono
Wow, not. Late night?

Somebody administer the last rites.

[nononono]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Somebody administer the last rites.

Burn?

[Valentine]

Chavez is to Venezuela as Bush is to Iraq.

FROM AP :

Death Threat May Bolster Chavez's Popularity Before Election
Aug. 24 -- Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez may see an increase in popularity because of the death threat leveled by a U.S. television evangelist, according to Datanalisis, the country's No. 1 polling company.

Television evangelist Pat Robertson's calls for the U.S. to ``assassinate'' Chavez will lead more Venezuelans to believe his claims that the Bush administration is trying to kill him, said Luis Vicente Leon, director of Caracas-based Datanalisis. The additional support may help Chavez's ruling coalition extend its majority in congress in December elections.

``The evangelist's declarations are terrible for the U.S. in that they totally back up Chavez,'' Leon said in a telephone interview from Caracas. ``It is absolutely going to have the opposite effect on Chavez than the U.S. wants. It's something that resonates with the country's poor.''

Seventy-one percent of Venezuelans said they support Chavez, 51, in a May poll by Datanalisis, up from 67 percent in April. Datanalisis, which surveyed 1,300 Venezuelans from May 6 to May 14, said the poll has a margin of error of 2.71 percentage points. Leon declined to say how much more of a boost Chavez could get in polls from Robertson's comments.

Chavez has used the additional revenue generated by the surge in oil, the South American country's biggest export, to increase government spending on education, health care and food subsidies.

`Criminal'

Robertson, a 75-year-old former U.S. presidential candidate who claims 1 million viewers a day for his ``700 Club'' program, said on the show on Aug. 21 that Chavez is a ``dangerous enemy'' and that killing him would be cheaper than going to war with Venezuela to remove him.

``I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it,'' Robertson said.

Chavez downplayed Robertson's comments.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Valentine
Chavez is to Venezuela as Bush is to Iraq.

FROM AP :

Death Threat May Bolster Chavez's Popularity Before Election
Aug. 24 -- Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez may see an increase in popularity because of the death threat leveled by a U.S. television evangelist, according to Datanalisis, the country's No. 1 polling company.

Television evangelist Pat Robertson's calls for the U.S. to ``assassinate'' Chavez will lead more Venezuelans to believe his claims that the Bush administration is trying to kill him, said Luis Vicente Leon, director of Caracas-based Datanalisis. The additional support may help Chavez's ruling coalition extend its majority in congress in December elections.

``The evangelist's declarations are terrible for the U.S. in that they totally back up Chavez,'' Leon said in a telephone interview from Caracas. ``It is absolutely going to have the opposite effect on Chavez than the U.S. wants. It's something that resonates with the country's poor.''

Seventy-one percent of Venezuelans said they support Chavez, 51, in a May poll by Datanalisis, up from 67 percent in April. Datanalisis, which surveyed 1,300 Venezuelans from May 6 to May 14, said the poll has a margin of error of 2.71 percentage points. Leon declined to say how much more of a boost Chavez could get in polls from Robertson's comments.

Chavez has used the additional revenue generated by the surge in oil, the South American country's biggest export, to increase government spending on education, health care and food subsidies.

`Criminal'

Robertson, a 75-year-old former U.S. presidential candidate who claims 1 million viewers a day for his ``700 Club'' program, said on the show on Aug. 21 that Chavez is a ``dangerous enemy'' and that killing him would be cheaper than going to war with Venezuela to remove him.

``I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it,'' Robertson said.

Chavez downplayed Robertson's comments.

Hi Valentine!

I'll sell you your old blueTriangle sock for $1000.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Hi Valentine!

I'll sell you your old blueTriangle sock for $1000.

Please note that the Board gets a 20% commission on that sale.

[Gattigap]

That POS McCain. Must every single goddamned Republican in America lay prostate before an altar in order to run for office?

The Arizona Star:

• McCain didn't comment on the resolution but vowed to continue speaking his mind.
  
  As the Gallup Poll noted, McCain has a generally consistent conservative voting record but forged a national reputation after a series of notable breaks with fellow Republicans.
  
  On Tuesday, though, he sided with the president on two issues that have made headlines recently: teaching intelligent design in schools and Cindy Sheehan, the grieving mother who has come to personify the anti-war movement.
  
  McCain told the Star that, like Bush, he believes "all points of view" should be available to students studying the origins of mankind.
  
  The theory of intelligent design says life is too complex to have developed through evolution, and that a higher power must have had a hand in guiding it.

I don't want to hear a single thing from Republicans in this country when this trend comes around to bite us in the ass. Not a single, freakin' thing.

Gattigap

[Spanky]

I was working today and yesterday so I haven't had time to post. However, I wanted to point out that I think it was Not Bob (Jim Rockford) that pointed our the errors in my posts by using a primary source.

I think someone else used a primary source to refute one of my statements. Sorry - I forgot who it was or what it was about.

However, it was nice to see someone quoting a primary souce instead of some fellow ideologues "expert" opinion as "persuasive" evidence (Hello Ty and others).

The primary sources forced a substantive argument which was a nice change.

Just wanted to point that out.