The babyjesuschristsuperstar on Board: filling the moral void of Clinton’s legacy

[Secret_Agent_Man]

Originally posted by bilmore
Partially. Chirac still stands by his main principle, which is "it's our responsibility to welcome them into our society and make them a part of us, and we've fucked that up royally." I saw his weasely utterances for a bit as . . . well, . . . weasely - but really, I've sort of been impressed that he's not called out the army and steamrolled the immigrant cities. He's stuck to his main thesis well. Have to admire that. In the long run, more cars will burn, but I think he leaves a greater chance of repproachement.

I just made up that word, as I can't remember the correct spelling.

Yes. he apparently mostly believes his own stuff.

I was absolutely shocked that (a) it took 12 days of riots before the local governments were granted emergency powers and (b) that it took the national government to grant those powers.

Their world is different.

S_A_M

P.S. Rapprochement (with some fancy things over a couple letters).

[nononono]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
this is not your best work. and you know I say that as someone who loves you. Platonically.

I know, I know. It's part of my master plan. From here on out, everything else will look to be an improvement.

Cite please?

This guy says they do, and it's a blog, so it must be true, yes? http://www.badsamaritan.com/archives...the_french.php

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by bilmore
disagree. The whole "Bush lied" bullshit is what's not honorable. Want to re-hash the entire conversation? Go read Podhoretz this week. I don't have the energy to fight the "if we say it enough times, people will believe it" bullshit.

I'm not talking about the WMD thing. I'm talking about all the other lies, misrepresentations and spin this admin has put out to blur their agenda. And I don't have the fucking time to list them all here.

And if you need them listed, or think this admin hasn't set a new standard for hiding the ball and bullshitting, you're in the Syd Barrett realm of self delusion.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by bilmore
disagree. The whole "Bush lied" bullshit is what's not honorable. Want to re-hash the entire conversation? Go read Podhoretz this week. I don't have the energy to fight the "if we say it enough times, people will believe it" bullshit.

Why is it not honorable to say the truth? Is that why Bush lies so much?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by nononono
I know, I know. It's part of my master plan. From here on out, everything else will look to be an improvement.

Okay, I am watching you.

Originally posted by nononono

This guy says they do, and it's a blog, so it must be true, yes? http://www.badsamaritan.com/archives...the_french.php

1. Blogs as citable authority went the way of Ty (of the present), i.e. gone.

2. Ty@50 has admitted that he has "much to regret". See: citing blogs as authority.

3. Even assuming that guy is correct in his blog, he cites that 80% of women are using deodorant. that leaves 20% of women stinking. And 100% of men. And notice, there was no mention of soap and water.

That is still a stinky country nox4. I fantasise a higher ideal for you. Platonically.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I'm not talking about the WMD thing. I'm talking about all the other lies, misrepresentations and spin this admin has put out to blur their agenda. And I don't have the fucking time to list them all here.

And if you need them listed, or think this admin hasn't set a new standard for hiding the ball and bullshitting, you're in the Syd Barrett realm of self delusion.

When you had your coke induced freak out do you think that there was any period of diminished oxygen to the brain?

I care. You know I care.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Why is it not honorable to say the truth? Is that why Bush lies so much?

When you post stuff like this you validate the claims of third rate hack socks, like lo-berry. You are better than that.

[nononono]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Okay, I am watching you.

You're tough, and note I'm just humoring you.

1. Blogs as citable authority went the way of Ty (of the present), i.e. gone.

That's why I picked it.

2. Ty@50 has admitted that he has "much to regret". See: citing blogs as authority.

3. Even assuming that guy is correct in his blog, he cites that 80% of women are using deodorant. that leaves 20% of women stinking. And 100% of men. And notice, there was no mention of soap and water.

That is still a stinky country nox4. I fantasise a higher ideal for you. Platonically.

Thank you for thinking of me, but when they wash, (some of them) are most sexy, though I'll admit it's been awhile...but they surely are better at the hygiene thing now than before, if anything. They couldn't be getting...stinkier? Ce sera impossible!

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by nononono
You're tough, and note I'm just humoring you.

Note, I am duly humoured by you.

Originally posted by nononono

That's why I picked it.

I'm not sure what this means, but a cautionary warning says, stay away from the path of Ty. It leads to nothing but regret. Hank knows what I mean.

Originally posted by nononono

They couldn't be getting...stinkier? Ce sera impossible!

Modern strains of bacteria have become not only more resistant to anti-bacterial agents but more pungent in their delivery systems.

[nononono]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I'm not sure what this means, but a cautionary warning says, stay away from the path of Ty. It leads to nothing but regret. Hank knows what I mean.

It means I knew how much you love blog citations, and I was only thinking of you. I'm accomodating like that.

Modern strains of bacteria have become not only more resistant to anti-bacterial agents but more pungent in their delivery systems.

Sacre bleu!

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by nononono
It means I knew how much you love blog citations, and I was only thinking of you. I'm accomodating like that.

Indeed. The. accommodatingest.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I'm not sure what this means, but a cautionary warning says, stay away from the path of Ty. It leads to nothing but regret. Hank knows what I mean.

I do not know what you mean. I have never found Mr. Slothrop to use his power improperly to censor, bash or humiliate me. Nothing any moderator or administrator has ever done was in the least bit improper. I am all the way happy, and do not have any complaints.

Also, FWIW, I do not beleive Ms. Paigow will be in charge someday. I also believe Mr. Slothrop will not change his political beliefs. I feel that Ty@50 sock does a disservice to a great man's name.

[bilmore]

"Conservative Christian broadcaster Pat Robertson told citizens of a Pennsylvania town that they had rejected God by voting their school board out of office for supporting "intelligent design" and warned them Thursday not to be surprised if disaster struck."

At what point does one logically decide that entering into a coalition with loonies as the only way to advance one's economic views is no longer viable?

Especially given that one's economic views arguably do not include "spending tax money like a drunken sailor"?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by bilmore
"Conservative Christian broadcaster Pat Robertson told citizens of a Pennsylvania town that they had rejected God by voting their school board out of office for supporting "intelligent design" and warned them Thursday not to be surprised if disaster struck."

At what point does one logically decide that entering into a coalition with loonies as the only way to advance one's economic views is no longer viable?

Especially given that one's economic views arguably do not include "spending tax money like a drunken sailor"?

Nov 2004.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Nov 2004.

I believe you have my stapler.