The babyjesuschristsuperstar on Board: filling the moral void of Clinton’s legacy

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Nonsense. The Wall St Journal oped page is like Natl Review for dumb single-minded business people who wouldn't get NR's humor or follow its prose.

dissent. Supply side economics and the Reagan Revolution were made feasible on the WSJ's op-ed pages, after the MSM boycotted and lied about the same.

We owe the continued existence of the Republic to the late Bob Bartley and his crew at the editorial board there.

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
.

The WSJ is a good paper, but there's not really much use for it anymore, considering the chief reason people used to use it is so much more effectively provided online.

I am old skool: I prefer to read a paper in the crapper to bringing my laptop in.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
2. the legacy of the demos.

they inspire a culture of marginalisation and mediocrity, which lends itself to whining and claims of victimisation by those that reject their culture of loserdom and actually succeed and prosper in society.

So lemme get this straight... You have an axe to grind with whiners, and you grind it by constantly whining about how much you dislike their whining?

You’re just another fucking phony is what you are. Another one the damned phonies...

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I am not a victim, yet I complain. Same appplies to most of the people posting here. What's that make us?

Dissent. the whiff of victimology plagues this place like stink on shite.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
So lemme get this straight... You have an axe to grind with whiners, and you grind it by constantly whining about how much you dislike their whining?

You’re just another fucking phony is what you are. Another one the damned phonies...

You sound like Holden Caulfield. You can do better than this.

I am not whining, I am exposing the hypocrasy and vacuity of the left, while championing a better, more socially just path to freedom. And like Spanky so correctly notes, in my own community, I am working to change the heart and minds of the unwashed kool-aide drunk left with a clarity of moral vision, common sense and socio-political rationalism.

[Spanky]

Originally posted by andViolins
Didn't you just answer your own rhetorical question right there?

aV

Exactly. Can't complain if you are not involved. I am telling people to get involved with their party.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
You sound like Holden Caulfield. You can do better than this.

True. Perhaps next time I'll preface my post with "Penske, the following is a veiled refernce to a literary character I'm comparing to you."

[Spanky]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
dissent. Supply side economics and the Reagan Revolution were made feasible on the WSJ's op-ed pages, after the MSM boycotted and lied about the same.

We owe the continued existence of the Republic to the late Bob Bartley and his crew at the editorial board there.



I am old skool: I prefer to read a paper in the crapper to bringing my laptop in.

In night shift Michael Keaton said about the WSJ. No comics, no Ann Landers, no sports page! What kind of paper is this?

[Spanky]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
So lemme get this straight... You have an axe to grind with whiners, and you grind it by constantly whining about how much you dislike their whining?

You’re just another fucking phony is what you are. Another one the damned phonies...

I think I am pretty good at whining. But I think I am entitled because I am involved and trying to change things. If you aren't involved stop your whining.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by Spanky
In night shift Michael Keaton said about the WSJ. No comics, no Ann Landers, no sports page! What kind of paper is this?

It's for this kind of perky, go-nowhere tidbit that I occasionally drop by the politics board. Mission accomplished!!

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by Spanky
In night shift Michael Keaton said about the WSJ. No comics, no Ann Landers, no sports page! What kind of paper is this?

Well done.

That's all I have to say.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Spanky
In night shift Michael Keaton said about the WSJ. No comics, no Ann Landers, no sports page! What kind of paper is this?

Spanky, you are citing a fictional character who wanted to feed the tuna mayonaisse to shortcut the tuna salad making process.

You do realise none of Martin Sheen, Jimmy Smits and Geena Davis actually have been PotUS, right?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Spanky
I think I am pretty good at whining. But I think I am entitled because I am involved and trying to change things. If you aren't involved stop your whining.

2. that applies to most of the natternabobsofnegativity on the left here, and elsewhere. And al Qaeda or Commie insurgency does not count as "trying to change" things, it is rather trying to "destroy God's gift of the UMC to man"

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Spanky
I think I am pretty good at whining. But I think I am entitled because I am involved and trying to change things. If you aren't involved stop your whining.

No.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Well done.

That's all I have to say.

Championing this type of ignorance insures that you will be pushing papers for the people who make the real money for the rest of career. Ask Sebby about the fur-lined handcuffs.

[Spanky]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Spanky, you are citing a fictional character who wanted to feed the tuna mayonaisse to shortcut the tuna salad making process.

You do realise none of Martin Sheen, Jimmy Smits and Geena Davis actually have been PotUS, right?

Although I agree with its politics, I have never really liked the WSJ. I prefer the economist. I think I prefer the fact that the Economist doesn't take itself too seriously. Plus - it has great cartoons.