» Site Navigation |
|
|
» Online Users: 4,766 |
| 0 members and 4,766 guests |
| No Members online |
| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM. |
|
04-04-2006, 04:59 PM
|
#8
|
|
World Ruler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,057
|
In defense of McKinney
Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Nah, not really.
Hank says:
Hmmm..... let's see.
The first to respond with substance was Gatti:
"twit." "assaulted." "idiocy."
Then, RT:
"real moron." 'course, i guess the story about her pen could be seen as a resounding defense (if you're an idiot)
Not Bob did say this:
But he also said, at the end of his judge hypo, this:
I said
And Shifty pointed out that McKinney is not remotely significant.
I could go on and on, but I think even a moron like you gets it by now. 3 or 4 "of us" didn't say a fucking thing in her defense, or "jump in" about how "the cops were at fault.". NB made the only statements that were even moderately in her favor, and even those were barely lukewarm.
The statements that were in McKinney's defense were quotes, mostly if not entirely of McKinney herself, and mostly posted by the Republicans on this board. You can let your feverish imagination run wild, to think that every Dem jumped on her bandwagon. But it's just your feverish imagination talking, nothing more.
|
What does that have to do with Clinton's impeachment?
W-A-T-E-R.
__________________
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:28 AM.