Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
Reid, D-Nev., said the administration should be taking the lead, but instead is relying on Germany, France and Great Britain to convince Iran to end its uranium enrichment program.
"It is hard to comprehend," Reid said Tuesday in Reno. "We should be involved at trying to arrive at a diplomatic solution. ... Not just these three countries."
|
You don't see a difference between saying that the US should lead -- or at least be involved in -- trying to arrive at a diplomatic solution, and that the US should not start a war without broad international support?
I'm not suggesting that Iran would talk to the US, or that Reid is correct in his criticism, or that a diplomatic solution would work. Just wondering that you view these positions as contradictory.
Threaded Mode