LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 146
0 members and 146 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-24-2006, 05:26 PM   #11
Sidd Finch
I am beyond a rank!
 
Sidd Finch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,873
Iraq v. Afghanistan

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Taking out a democratic regime, no matter how bad, is always dicey morally. There is no question that taking out a regime that is not democratic and not providing prosperity is OK. And there is no question that taking out a democratic regime that is providing prosperity is wrong. It is in the grey areas where things get iffy.

If a non democratic regime is providing prosperity and the middle class is growing then probably it is better to just let evolution take its course. If the regime is democratic and screwing over the country is is also probably better to leave it alone. Before you can move in, you probably need to let it turn into despotic regime (which usually happens in countrys where prosperity continues to decline) before you intervene.

You had a rather different opinion about the democratically elected regime in Chile, I recall.
Sidd Finch is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:56 AM.