LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 100
0 members and 100 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-06-2006, 03:58 PM   #11
Sexual Harassment Panda
Don't touch there
 
Sexual Harassment Panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Master-Planned Reality-Based Community
Posts: 1,220
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
I would guess that a substantial percentage of the larger gifts do, in fact, involve appreciated assets.

What you'd need are data on the amount of charitable giving per person (i.e., how much came from gifts of <$100, $100-500, 500-1000, >1000, etc.) I would guess that most gifts in the range over a few thousand dollars involve appreciated assets. It's only sensible. And I would guess that a substantial percentage of charitable giving is concentrated in gifts of large amounts, simply because a large gift is generally more than hundreds of small gifts.
Well, yes I agree that would make sense to do it that way, if one were a corporation. But I get solicitations all the time and I'm no corporation, and mostly I hand out cold hard ducats. It feels like you're correct, but I was curious about a source to confirm it.
Sexual Harassment Panda is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 AM.