LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 104
0 members and 104 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-08-2006, 06:20 PM   #11
baltassoc
Caustically Optimistic
 
baltassoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City That Reads
Posts: 2,385
You're forgetting one thing

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Or Jews. I guess I'm twice-screwed.
Odd that your views are more in line with our Puritan forfathers than others on this board.

From a Puritan perspective, estate taxes are good because they tax free money. Not to the decedent, of course, but then again s/he's dead and his wealth is now determined by the stregth of his morals, not his business accumen. But to the heirs, it's money not earned. Money not earned is corrupting, and causes shiftlessness. Money earned is reflective of upstanding morality. Better - if one must tax - to tax money that corrupts than money rightfully earned by the sweat of the brow, as these earnings are righteous, and indicative of one's moral strength.

(A perspective which also allows one to not have very much pity on the poor - if one is poor, it must be due to a moral failing.)
__________________
torture is wrong.
baltassoc is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 PM.