LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 104
0 members and 104 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-09-2006, 08:49 AM   #11
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Just plain wrong

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Too bad the government passed up the chance to kill him in 2002, but they needed him then to make the case for war.
See Bob, this is why you just post here but they gave Ty the keys. Not Bob, Super Mod sez: Actually, Hank, I have keys here, too.

You cannot say "killing Zarqawi probably won't help." Because, you still have to be able to say "invading Iraq moved the troops we would have had in Afghanistan, and we otherwise would have killed Osama."

Your way the shell game falls down. If killing a leader doesn't mean much, you can't get on W for the Osama is still alive thing.

Better to go with Ty's "Zarqawi should have been killed 4 years ago." If someone points out that Osama was offered up to us by Sudan 10 years ago, but Clinton had a boner that day, so he couldn't act on THAT offer, well sit back and let Ty get some blogs-answers going.

edited by Not Bob because he can.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Not Bob; 06-09-2006 at 09:52 AM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 PM.