LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,763
0 members and 1,763 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-28-2006, 04:44 PM   #11
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
NYT - time for a complete boycott

Quote:
Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
Sure, because al Qaeda believed that they could use US banks to transfer funds like normal folks who never do anything wrong and so have nothing to worry about, and the Feds would never ever even THINK they would do that, and never ever monitor bank accounts!!

The people who have their panties twisted over this are idiots. This is the nonissue of the year.
Your sarcasm is just pathetic considering that they had already caught terrorists using the method you could never work. So clearly "Al Queda believed that they could use US Banks to transfer funds". But actually it was international bank transfers that no one has any right of privacy over and this sort of tracking is key to the war on Terror.
Spanky is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 PM.