LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 104
0 members and 104 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-10-2006, 02:42 AM   #11
SlaveNoMore
Consigliere
 
SlaveNoMore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,480
Say it ain't so, Joe

Quote:
Spanky
If the middle east were developed (like Malaysia) we wouldn't have these problems. These middle easterners are upset because their homelands are screwed up and they believe the west is either totally or partially responsible. If their homelands were developed stable democracies (or at least somewhat democratic growing capitalist economies) like Malaysia they wouldn't have anything to complain about (and they wouldn't have had to migrate to find or better life, and could migrate back).

There were all sorts of terroist groups in Western Europe and Japan after the war (red brigrades etc.) but as those econonies developed and became prosperous again the steam just dissapated from those groups (and from their support).

However, as far as Israel is concerned, no amount of economic growth and development is ever going to make middle easterners accept Israel or its right to exist. As far is Israeli security is concerned, they might be better of keeping the entire middle east poor and underdeveloped.
Why then does the leader of "developed" Malaysia tow the Pan-Arab party line and often mention the "Zionist State"?
SlaveNoMore is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 PM.