All Hank, all the time.

[Spanky]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Spank, my earelier posts notwithstanding, the problem here is, that overtime (although not so much in 1948), the UN has become an unbridled haven for anti-semitic commie and/or socialist haters. They hate us, they hate the Jews, they hate commerce and markets, although, oddly, they like having the UN HQ in New York as opposed to some shithole third world country, presumably so they can access all our freedom and markets have to offer.

Anyhoo, they have illegitimised themselves. These are the same people who support awarding genocidal babykillers with nobel peace prises. At this point, its the law ofthe gun, maybe the god fearing good guys win!!!

OK fine. But don't expect Muslims and Arabs to accept Israel just because it was created by a UN resolution and then say the UN is a ridiculous organization (which it is). UN resolutions do not equal international law nor are they by definition ethical.

And don't expect Muslims and Arabs to accept Israel based on some moral natural law argument. That doesn't cut the cake either.

Israel was created at the point of a gun, and people got screwed when it was created. It is the denial of this fact that has lead to the current screwed up situation of believing that if Israel is nice to its neighbors or if its neighbors "just get educated" they will change their minds. To expect the original inhabitants of what is now the state of Israel to ever want anything but its destruction, is naive, completely delusional and unrealistic.

If you are going to grab some land, expel the inhabitants and create a nation, if it is going to work, you need to have defensible borders for that nation. Israel grabbed some land, expelled the inhabitants, but then didn't grab a piece of land that was defensible and then they left the people they screwed in a position to wreck havoc on the state of Israel. .

Realizing that mistake, they are now under the delusion that if they grab the land that is necessary to make Israel defensible, they can leave the original inhabitants of that land in the place they have occupied, still hold onto the property and get the people that live there (and the rest of the world) to accept it as morally righteous and ethically defendable act. And maybe a monkey will fly out of my derriere.

Israel either needs to complete the job, expel the Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza, create a defensible state (by building a huge wall around the whole country), or just give it up and call it a day.

Am I wrong?