LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 121
0 members and 121 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-28-2006, 06:30 PM   #11
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Victimhood

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I think I would feel safer if they were looking at a bunch of other stuff -- religious views, national origin, travel to countries like Pakistan or Saudi Arabia -- rather than ethnicity. The profile is no good if it sweeps up too many people. It becomes an exercise is CYA before the courts rather than a tool to catch the right people.
I think National Origin and ethnicty are pretty similar. It depends if you think a U.S. citizen whose parants are from Pakistan is considered a person of Pakistani national origin (similar to the British terrorists).

Where it gets distinct is what about a Kurdish person from Iraq? I think an Arab from Iraq is more likely to hijack a plane than a Kurd from Iraq. That is why I think ethnicity should be taken into consideration. But I agree that race is not good (Caucasian, Black, Hispanic etc.) because they are too broad and are really meaningless.
Spanky is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 PM.