» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 918 |
0 members and 918 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM. |
|
 |
|
09-01-2006, 11:10 AM
|
#121
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,133
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
"Offend"? Maybe. As I suggested above, I don't think they should be doing it. But I guess I don't see it as likely to intimidate, absent additional facts.
|
95% of what i post here is total horseshit- but the next bit I truly believe: your above post is sad. think about what you're saying.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:12 AM
|
#122
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,133
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The people killed in the Spanish Civil War and the repression of Franco's regime cannot exactly be chalked up to the evils of liberalism.
|
without them we'd have no Guernica. without guernica can we safely say I'd still have become the "most beloved" poster? Probably.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:16 AM
|
#123
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,062
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
95% of what i post here is total horseshit- but the next bit I truly believe: your above post is sad. think about what you're saying.
|
That I disapprove but am not "offended"? Or that I think it's possible but not certain that people would be intimidated?
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:17 AM
|
#124
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,062
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
without them we'd have no Guernica. without guernica can we safely say I'd still have become the "most beloved" poster? Probably.
|
Your priorities are certainly clear enough.
18 more Hank posts to the next non-horseshit one?
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:17 AM
|
#125
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,133
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
That I disapprove but am not "offended"? Or that I think it's possible but not certain that people would be intimidated?
|
how come those booths have the curtains? government eccess? how many Jewish or muslin kids will be offended by an Xmas tree in class. damn few- still the risk that one might does justify keeping it out. maybe one person would be intimidated?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:18 AM
|
#126
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
There is a better way, you know.
|
The cult of victimology and giving oneself over to the forces of Islamofacist hate?
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:19 AM
|
#127
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,133
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Your priorities are certainly clear enough.
18 more Hank posts to the next non-horseshit one?
|
difference between you and me? my horseshit don't stink. Now.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:21 AM
|
#128
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The kind that come in the little box with the straw stuck on the side? Is that the one that you would pair with the McRib sandwich, or am I thinking of one of your Washington state boxed sparkling roses?
|
The irony is, CA is so consumed with seeking to regain its past glory back from the PacNW, it doesn't even see CT coming, and it will be too late before it does. But, hey, the proles need wine, albeit boxed, too.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:22 AM
|
#129
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,062
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
how come those booths have the curtains? government eccess? how many Jewish or muslin kids will be offended by an Xmas tree in class. damn few- still the risk that one might does justify keeping it out. maybe one person would be intimidated?
|
Are you under the misapprehension that I support what you described?
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:24 AM
|
#130
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The people killed in the Spanish Civil War and the repression of Franco's regime cannot exactly be chalked up to the evils of liberalism.
I think we can all agree that Stalin's Russia was no bed of roses either. Since y'all are opposed to ever appeasing terrorists, I take you think we should have gone to war with the USSR in 1939?
|
I think we should have kept going in 45, all the way east until we hit Peking.
eta: it's a shame that Roosevelt lied to the country about his intentions on getting into the war. probably led to a pourly planned strategy and the eventual capitulation to the forces of communism at Yalta. Another successful fuck up for the Dems.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:24 AM
|
#131
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,133
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Are you under the misapprehension that I support what you described?
|
your party apparently does. are you part of the solution?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:26 AM
|
#132
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,062
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
The irony is, CA is so consumed with seeking to regain its past glory back from the PacNW, it doesn't even see CT coming, and it will be too late before it does. But, hey, the proles need wine, albeit boxed, too.
|
If I were investing in CT's wine industry -- and let's just make clear that I'm not -- I don't think I would be aiming to produce boxed wine aimed at the prole market, no matter how tasty you think it is.
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:28 AM
|
#133
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,062
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
I think we should have kept going in 45, all the way east until we hit Peking.
|
Why would you have waited until 1945? I gather you think it's OK to support repressive mass-murdering thugs just so long as you stop after several years?
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:28 AM
|
#134
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,062
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
your party apparently does. are you part of the solution?
|
Yes.
I'm glad that's cleared up.
eta: Hat trick! w00t!
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 11:30 AM
|
#135
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,280
|
The moment of bipartisan agreement
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
how come those booths have the curtains? government eccess? how many Jewish or muslin kids will be offended by an Xmas tree in class. damn few- still the risk that one might does justify keeping it out. maybe one person would be intimidated?
|
I'm sad that they don't let me take my dogs in to the voting booth with me. We always walk to the polling place in our neighborhood and they used to be able to come into the booth with me. Someone complained a few years ago, though, so the dogs have to stay outside tied to a tree while I vote. I valued their imput.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|