LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 125
0 members and 125 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-07-2006, 12:56 AM   #11
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
The Spanky Group: - irridentism it is the wave of the future

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop

I guess I picked the wrong example with Sikhs, since religion is the salient thing there. Except that the push for an independent Khalistan cuts across an ethnic group, per your explanation, and finds people wanting to define their nation by religion instead. With suggests that ethnicity is not as central to nationalism as you say.
India is not really worried about a Khalistan forming. They are worried about the Terrorism that concept encourages. But India is very scared of India following apart along ethnic lines. That is why India will not give up on Kashmir or Assam. They are like the Russians with Chechnya. They think once they let one ethnic group go, all the other ethnic groups (like the Punjabis) will get national aspirations.

National ethnic aspirations are what the Indian government fears the most. The question is will they get weaker or stronger as India industrializes. I think it will get stronger.
Spanky is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 AM.