Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Is that what it says? 'Splain, please.
|
It being EFCA? Or It being Slave? If its EFCA, I think the idea is that the law would take away a secret ballot election and replace ith with card check for purposes of union representation.
But you knew that.
I thought that Slave's point was that any attempt by Democrats to try and attack Republicans in regard to secret ballot elections rings hollow when their supporters are pushing to do away with secret ballot elections in the union context.
However I probably shouldn't be speaking for Slave or his point.
aV
Threaded Mode