| 
	
		
			
				|  » Site Navigation |  
	|  |  
	
		
			
				|  » Online Users: 204 |  
| 0 members and 204 guests |  
		| No Members online |  
		| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |  | 
	
		|  |  
	
	
	
	
		|  03-13-2009, 05:42 PM | #1 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				Re: Maybe ever.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)  How many people in the dollar store looked at the date label? |  does someone have to be shown to be fooled for the crime to be complete? say when a cop sets up a con man, no one is fooled by the attempt, but he is still prosecuted, isn't he?
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts   |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  03-13-2009, 05:45 PM | #2 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pop goes the chupacabra 
					Posts: 18,532
				      | 
				
				Re: Maybe ever.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski  does someone have to be shown to be fooled for the crime to be complete? say when a cop sets up a con man, no one is fooled by the attempt, but he is still prosecuted, isn't he? |  You have to show the guy was trying to fool someone.  That wasn't proven.
				__________________[Dictated but not read]
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  03-13-2009, 05:57 PM | #3 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				Re: Maybe ever.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)  You have to show the guy was trying to fool someone.  That wasn't proven. |  this is getting circular, but what was putting the new label on?
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts   |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  03-13-2009, 05:59 PM | #4 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pop goes the chupacabra 
					Posts: 18,532
				      | 
				
				Re: Maybe ever.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski  this is getting circular, but what was putting the new label on? |  Correcting an untruth?  Henri's, let alone the government, never established that the "purchase by" date meant anything.  Perhaps Henri's should be indicted for wire fraud because their label misled people into thinking the dressing went bad before it did.
				__________________[Dictated but not read]
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  03-13-2009, 06:10 PM | #5 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				Re: Maybe ever.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by mmmm, burger (c.j.)  correcting an untruth? |  g.o.
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts   |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  03-13-2009, 06:20 PM | #6 |  
	| Wearing the cranky pants 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pulling your finger 
					Posts: 7,122
				      | 
				
				Re: Maybe ever.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)  Correcting an untruth?  Henri's, let alone the government, never established that the "purchase by" date meant anything.  Perhaps Henri's should be indicted for wire fraud because their label misled people into thinking the dressing went bad before it did. |  BTW, I am not buying any Henri's after this.  Right up there with Pringles, the non-potato chip.
				__________________Boogers!
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 10:30 AM | #7 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pop goes the chupacabra 
					Posts: 18,532
				      | 
				
				Re: It was the wrong thread
			 
 Guess this is one of those laugh or cry ones (probably mostly the latter): 
Mom who killed kid as part of religious cult can withdraw guilty plea  if her child is resurrected, as she believes will happen.
				__________________[Dictated but not read]
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  03-13-2009, 05:46 PM | #8 |  
	| Wearing the cranky pants 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pulling your finger 
					Posts: 7,122
				      | 
				
				Re: Maybe ever.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski  does someone have to be shown to be fooled for the crime to be complete? say when a cop sets up a con man, no one is fooled by the attempt, but he is still prosecuted, isn't he? |  What crime?  There was no evidence adduced that the second "best if" date was false.  Nor any evidence the first "best if" date was anything other than puffery.
				__________________Boogers!
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		|  |  
 
 
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
 
	
	
		
	
	
 |