LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 198
0 members and 198 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-03-2015, 10:11 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
My point was that if you are trying to create incentives to get car makers to build these cars, it makes some sense to give the stickers to the first x such cars from a given manufacturer, rather than the first y such cars. That spurs product choice and development, rather than a huge first-mover advantage.
Living in a place where Prius sales are twice as high on the side of the river where they get an HOV exemption than on the side where they don't, I didn't realize California HOV exemption policy was so nuanced - I take it that any new model meeting certain criteria can get an HOV sticker up to some specified production volume? With the idea being that it gives an implicit subsidy (at the expense of all other drivers) to cover the fixed costs of a new car rollout? China could learn something from such carefully tailored industrial policies . . .
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 PM.