LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 125
0 members and 125 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-26-2020, 07:23 PM   #11
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
Re: Consider the source but

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icky Thump View Post
No, you are just plain wrong.

They. Are. Releasing. People. Who. Test. Positive.

Quarantine at home.
No shit. The hospitals are under siege [eta: Here is mine]. If someone is not sick enough to need a hospital, they are keeping the hospital beds for other people who are. So you send people home, to quarantine. But the idea is not to "quarantine" with uninfected, highly suspectible people, like someone who is 100 years old. Because that is not a quarantine, and it will kill people. If that's what happened, many it's because a lot of people don't have a second house to go quarantine in, but it's not because this cocktail prevents someone who has the virus from infecting other people.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar

Last edited by Tyrone Slothrop; 03-26-2020 at 07:32 PM..
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 PM.