LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,902
0 members and 1,902 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-02-2020, 07:47 PM   #11
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF View Post
In short, age may be irrelevant. Preexisting conditions such as heart disease, cancer, lung disease, or diabetes matter. Of course, those exist in greater percentages among the old. But also in greater percentages among the young in the American south, i.e. the fat smokers who don't exercise and eat poorly.

tl;dr - once again, people looked at correlation and wrongly saw causation.
I love you like kin, but "those exist in greater percentages among the old" means age does matter.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:11 AM.