LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 269
0 members and 269 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 07:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2020, 12:53 PM   #2056
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,132
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan View Post
One thing that has bothered me for a long time from a privacy perspective is the welfare check. There are a lot of instances when I'd love to authorize our people to call for a welfare check on either a student or a patient, but I don't because the only avenue is calling law enforcement, and there are very proscribed rules in both HIPAA and FERPA for disclosing protected information to law enforcement. Most of the time the law enforcement exceptions do not apply, because the threat is not imminent. If there were a crisis intervention welfare agency that could do those sorts of checks, it'd benefit our populations greatly.

There are so many things we shove over to law enforcement that they're not really the best people to do. We run and staff the psych hospital. So many of our patients come from someone having called the police because someone was acting erratic or otherwise off. Some of them are event violent. But the criminal justice system is not equipped to handle them.

There are something like 18 overlapping police departments in the med center. I've never really understood why so many are necessary, especially the forces for private entities like the Med Center itself or Rice University. One of my closest friends, a Ph.D, in economics from Cal Tech and an undergrad in math from Harvard, was hauled to jail by one of the Med Center cops after she rolled a stop sign and didn't pull over fast enough for the cop's liking. I think the charge was "evading arrest" in a fucking parking garage. I'm sure that her brown skin had absolutely nothing to do with it. Cop was so irritated with her he called her boss in some sort of misguided effort to get her fired. They're fucking mall cops with arrest power, and they are itching to use it. A lot of them end up on the smaller forces when they can't cut it in the bigger forces.
c.f. If you live in Detroit near Wayne State University and you have trouble, first you call Wayne State Police THEN you call Detroit Police. Detroit may come, but almost always after Wayne gets there. I have no idea how Campus police have any jurisdiction off campus- maybe because the area is heavily students. I've heard that many times from non-student residents of the area.

But otherwise my memory of Michigan State U Campus police, is Mall cops with guns, agree. The fucks would sit in parking lots near bars and follow cars after last call until they turned onto campus then lights!!!
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 06-09-2020 at 12:56 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 02:26 PM   #2057
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,057
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
I read the article you cited. Here's the TL;DR for anyone interested:

"I think Cotton's article should not have been given a platform at the Times. We should have people who share my sensibilities limit what gets on the Oped page."

It's just another asshole with an inflated sense of self-enlightenment, and entitlement, declaring himself a brahmin who ought to have editorial powers over the public square. The article offered no insight. I should have gone with "I want my 3 minutes back" rather than treat it seriously.
You are more interesting when you're not a moron. (And thank you for confirming that you hadn't read it when you first responded, like Bennet not having read Cotton's op-ed when the NYT was sanctimoniously telling people how important it is to be exposed to other views.)
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 02:51 PM   #2058
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,211
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
You are more interesting when you're not a moron. (And thank you for confirming that you hadn't read it when you first responded, like Bennet not having read Cotton's op-ed when the NYT was sanctimoniously telling people how important it is to be exposed to other views.)
You misread me. I meant I had read prior to my first response.

As I said, not insightful in the least.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 03:05 PM   #2059
Replaced_Texan
Random Syndicate (admin)
 
Replaced_Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,278
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
c.f. If you live in Detroit near Wayne State University and you have trouble, first you call Wayne State Police THEN you call Detroit Police. Detroit may come, but almost always after Wayne gets there. I have no idea how Campus police have any jurisdiction off campus- maybe because the area is heavily students. I've heard that many times from non-student residents of the area.

But otherwise my memory of Michigan State U Campus police, is Mall cops with guns, agree. The fucks would sit in parking lots near bars and follow cars after last call until they turned onto campus then lights!!!
I work really closely with campus police, and it's a benefit and a curse. Quick response, established relationships, etc. But also, things we'd rather not escalate they might.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
Replaced_Texan is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 03:07 PM   #2060
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,057
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
You misread me. I meant I had read prior to my first response.

As I said, not insightful in the least.
Seriously -- he's not even talking about what you think he's talking about. Why pretend to read something you haven't?

If you were the editor of the NYT, would you have chosen run Cotton's op-ed piece?
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 04:20 PM   #2061
Icky Thump
Registered User
 
Icky Thump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,565
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
Seriously -- he's not even talking about what you think he's talking about. Why pretend to read something you haven't?

If you were the editor of the NYT, would you have chosen run Cotton's op-ed piece?
Fuck yes. People need to know how crazy that mofo is.
__________________
gothamtakecontrol
Icky Thump is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 04:23 PM   #2062
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,132
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post

If you were the editor of the NYT, would you have chosen run Cotton's op-ed piece?
If I were the editor of the NYT, you would certainly not have my contact information. Who would you turn to for all the free legal advice?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 04:23 PM   #2063
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,132
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icky Thump View Post
Fuck yes. People need to know how crazy that mofo is.
Paigow called, she wants you to change your avatar. TIA
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 04:31 PM   #2064
Icky Thump
Registered User
 
Icky Thump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,565
Re: Objectively intelligent.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...ice-department

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mzPj_IaMzY

Just note there are trends toward police departments that deescalate rather than just crack heads.
__________________
gothamtakecontrol
Icky Thump is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 04:38 PM   #2065
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,132
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icky Thump View Post
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...ice-department

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mzPj_IaMzY

Just note there are trends toward police departments that deescalate rather than just crack heads.
I just opened the top link and it said "this is your last free article." WTF, man you should have made that one count more.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 04:47 PM   #2066
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,057
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icky Thump View Post
Fuck yes. People need to know how crazy that mofo is.
So run a news story. The headline writes itself: Sen. Cotton Is A Crazy Mofo.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 04:57 PM   #2067
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,162
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
what is a public safety system, and how does it differ from police? how does Minneapolis transition? What if someone breaks in your house armed during the transition?

over the years several police forces have been put under Fed scrutiny, Detroit's included. One major change was to make the racial make up, especially in command positions, look like the community. Minneapolis's police does not look like the community.
There’s a ton out there you could read. But factually, I think the MPD is fairly diverse already.

If someone breaks into your house, armed, then send the armed police. But, first, that happens pretty rarely, and, second, they likely won’t get there before the burglars are gone anyway (unless it’s an even more rare hostage situation. What actually happens some is that someone breaks into your apartment while you were gone and the responding officer is going to come and write a report on it. Does that need a person with a gun?
Adder is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 05:13 PM   #2068
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,211
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
So run a news story. The headline writes itself: Sen. Cotton Is A Crazy Mofo.
Who the fuck are you to decide that?

That was the point of my reply. That asshole assumed he has the right to decide what is and isn’t in the sphere of deviancy.

I say let a crazy opinion be shot down by readers. I’d have run Cotton’s Oped all day long, and also run the stupid article you cited, so people could shoot that down as well.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 05:19 PM   #2069
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,057
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
Who the fuck are you to decide that?
Dude, my question was, what would you do if you were the editor? Do you read at a first-grade level?

Quote:
That was the point of my reply. That asshole assumed he has the right to decide what is and isn’t in the sphere of deviancy.

I say let a crazy opinion be shot down by readers. I’d have run Cotton’s Oped all day long, and also run the stupid article you cited, so people could shoot that down as well.
If you're running a newspaper, you have to make choices. If you go out and ask Cotton to write up his crazy views, you can't run something else. If you only have a small section in the paper and you have to choose -- like, if you're the editor -- then why would you run Cotton's piece instead of something else? Stop rejecting the idea that you have to make choices -- that's what editors do.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 05:20 PM   #2070
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,211
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
Seriously -- he's not even talking about what you think he's talking about. Why pretend to read something you haven't?

If you were the editor of the NYT, would you have chosen run Cotton's op-ed piece?
I read it, and I read Cotton’s piece, and I offered my reaction to both. You seem confused. And you do this a lot lately. You offer something, and when someone reacts to it in a manner that doesn’t fall into the debate you want to have, you whine and attack.

The article clearly made the argument, which you’ve acknowledged, that Cotton’s piece should not have been run as an Oped because the ideas raised in it are dangerous and some facts in it are inaccurate. Its facts should have been better vetted. But as to the dangerousness of its prescriptions? Well, that’s for the audience to decide. Not some ass like the author of the piece you cited (or you) who thinks he knows best what the audience should be allowed to consider.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 PM.