LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,743
0 members and 1,743 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-10-2020, 04:21 PM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
Worth reading re Harper's and the public discourse:

This thread is really good

This response [to the Harper's letter, not to the thread above]

Don't know that I am completely agree with the latter, but after reading it I think I understand that much of the reaction to it had to do with the perception that the letter was revisionist history reframing a bunch of other disputes.
The first thread is insightful. It examines the degradation of online discourse and makes a decent case for ignoring those acting in bad faith.

The second is juvenile. It's identity based and attempts to use "power dynamics" as the basis on which to determine matters of free speech. Free speech is free speech is free speech. The concept is abstract. That some voices have more power is immaterial.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 AM.