Objectively intelligent.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

I thought that by Adder's reasoning, intent is irrelevant: If you say or do things that tend to perpetuate systemic racism, you're a racist.

Schor is not perpetuating racism. He's assisting antiracism by advising antiracists to avoid counterproductive action.

Hence the Danton reference. Danton (I believe... it's been a while) was insufficiently supportive of extreme actions against the aristocracy. He viewed the Terror as a thing which would eat itself. Robespierre thought otherwise. Neither ultimately did well.