LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 126
0 members and 126 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-13-2021, 12:14 PM   #1
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Martin Gurri

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post






At the risk of outing myself (ha), I have taken a class from Sandel. He's smart.
There are two ways a person can say another is smart- one can recognize another has intelligence far beyond their own. Or one can be so much smarter than one can quantify the other as being "smart" to a certain level. Which was your statement here?
Quote:
But is the problem "merit"? If you think for a second about what you say about, the problem is not "merit," it's that the upper middle class (etc.) have real advantages because they have more money. If you go to Scarsdale H.S., you're going to get a better education and better opportunities than if you go to P.S. 123 in the Bronx. How many kids from Scarsdale go to Harvard (hi Hank!), and how many from your average public school in the Bronx go there?
I'm from the 313 equivalent of tobacco road, so I have "merit" to my Harvard/Yale/Stanford degrees.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2021, 11:27 PM   #2
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,082
Re: Martin Gurri

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
There are two ways a person can say another is smart- one can recognize another has intelligence far beyond their own. Or one can be so much smarter than one can quantify the other as being "smart" to a certain level. Which was your statement here?
It kinda makes you wonder why they run ads for new televisions. If you're watching on a television good enough to tell how awesome the picture is, you don't really need a new one.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2021, 04:19 PM   #3
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Martin Gurri

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
It kinda makes you wonder why they run ads for new televisions. If you're watching on a television good enough to tell how awesome the picture is, you don't really need a new one.
You watch commercials. You're smarter than that- and I have the ability to quantify how smart.

edit: we both have old guy eyesight now, so we don't need new ones BTW.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 11-15-2021 at 04:28 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 AM.