Fashion Board 2-3-04 to 3-5-04

[Atticus Grinch]

Harvard okays student porn magazine; photos limited to Harvard undergraduates.

I shit you not.

Bonus fact: they stole the idea from Vassar.

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by Flinty_McFlint
Actually I have seen that show, and in particular, that guy.

Really?
I have a new-found respect for you.
:bounce:

I was told that I was the only person sick enough to actually watch that show. And to catch the reruns. That doctor guy with the dead girl is legendary, though.
I suppose you also watched 101 things removed from the human body?
Oh, and viva in Mexico, vive in France. Otherwise, it pisses off the french.

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
Sunny, you just outed yourself. I had this very conversation with a female lawyer two summers ago. She wanted to import dwarves to cater a huge party she wanted to throw to celebrate her acquisition of new body art. Do you have your, um, nether regions peirced?

I clearly hang out* with the wrong kind of lawyers.

*In real life, that is -- my imaginary lawyer friends are all very interesting. Oh, and sorry about the footnote, paigow. I tried putting this in the post itself, but it just disrupted the flow.

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally posted by Not Bob
I clearly hang out* with the wrong kind of lawyers.

*In real life, that is -- my imaginary lawyer friends are all very interesting. Oh, and sorry about the footnote, paigow. I tried putting this in the post itself, but it just disrupted the flow.

You could try this:

I clearly hang out with the wrong kind of lawyers.

In real life, that is -- my imaginary lawyer friends are all very interesting.

[taxwonk]

Originally posted by NotFromHere
Oh, and viva in Mexico, vive in France. Otherwise, it pisses off the french.

In some parts, that's considered a bonus.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
You could try this:

I clearly hang out with the wrong kind of lawyers.

In real life, that is -- my imaginary lawyer friends are all very interesting.

I'm with Not Bob. The flow is off somehow. Nice try, though.

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
You could try this:

I clearly hang out with the wrong kind of lawyers.

In real life, that is -- my imaginary lawyer friends are all very interesting.

Thanks, Flower! For some reason, I was fixated on using a parenthetical. That works very well, and it wouldn't have offended Paigow had I done it that way. You're the greatest.

Uh, maybe I could email a slip and fall mediation statement to you for your review and editing?

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Not Bob
I clearly hang out* with the wrong kind of lawyers.

*In real life, that is -- my imaginary lawyer friends are all very interesting. Oh, and sorry about the footnote, paigow. I tried putting this in the post itself, but it just disrupted the flow.

If the piercings are in the nether regions, you may just not know that you are hanging out with the right kind of lawyers. However, as a GP, you clearly have the power to check this out. Just tell female associates that they have to show you each and every piercing they have, and that they should be prepared to (a) discuss and demonstrate the utility of each piercing, and/or (b) describe in detail the sensations, both physical and emotional, of getting each piercing.

[bilmore]

Originally posted by Not Bob
That works very well, and it wouldn't have offended Paigow had I done it that way.

Stop arguing with yourself.

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I'm with Not Bob. The flow is off somehow. Nice try, though.

I suppose it is a matter of preference. I find the asterisk to be more disruptive of the flow than having no asterisk and just having the footnoted words in the next sentence. But, I am mostly indifferent about the use of footnotes in Lawtalkers posts, even if they are arguably gratuitous. I was just thinking of The Paigow.

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally posted by Not Bob
Thanks, Flower! For some reason, I was fixated on using a parenthetical. That works very well, and it wouldn't have offended Paigow had I done it that way. You're the greatest.

Uh, maybe I could email a slip and fall mediation statement to you for your review and editing?

You're welcome, although you may want to reconsider in light of GWNC's post, and then possibly re-reconsider in light of my response.

p_l_flower[at]yahoo.com - I'd be happy to help.



just trying to save you from yourself. and spam. e/o

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
If the piercings are in the nether regions, you may just not know that you are hanging out with the right kind of lawyers. However, as a GP, you clearly have the power to check this out. Just tell female associates that they have to show you each and every piercing they have, and that they should be prepared to (a) discuss and demonstrate the utility of each piercing, and/or (b) describe in detail the sensations, both physical and emotional, of getting each piercing.

I tried that. Fenwick told me, and I quote, "it's none of your beeswax, you old prevert."

I turned the kid in to the NB&A Anti-Harassment Task Force. Ageist remarks are Not Tolerated here.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
I suppose it is a matter of preference. I find the asterisk to be more disruptive of the flow than having no asterisk and just having the footnoted words in the next sentence. But, I am mostly indifferent about the use of footnotes in Lawtalkers posts, even if they are arguably gratuitous. I was just thinking of The Paigow.

Perhaps I was being too subtle.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
I suppose it is a matter of preference. I find the asterisk to be more disruptive of the flow than having no asterisk and just having the footnoted words in the next sentence. But, I am mostly indifferent about the use of footnotes in Lawtalkers posts, even if they are arguably gratuitous. I was just thinking of The Paigow.

She does not appear to be around to be offended.

I do think that, given the content of the footnoted information, the asterisk would have gone better at the end of the sentence, where it would have been clearly relatin gto lawyers, not to hanging out. But I'm really, really sleepy so my perceptions may be offer than usual.

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
Perhaps I was being too subtle.

I doubt it.